ArticleBMC systems biology2009
Using cell fate attractors to uncover transcriptional regulation of HL60 neutrophil differentiation.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intracellular Accumulation and Secretion of YKL-40 (CHI3L1) in the Course of DMSO-Induced HL-60 Cell Differentiation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- AClinical and experimental immunology · 2021Article
- A roadmap towards personalized immunology.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2018Article
- Article
- A global assessment of stem cell engineering.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2014Article
- Gene expression variability as a unifying element of the pluripotency network.Stem cell reports · 2014Article
- Microfluidic device capable of medium recirculation for non-adherent cell culture.Biomicrofluidics · 2014Article
- Modeling and visualizing cell type switching.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2014Article
- Multistable switches and their role in cellular differentiation networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Predicting missing expression values in gene regulatory networks using a discrete logic modeling optimization guided by network stable states.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
- Dimethylsulfoxide exposure modulates HL-60 cell rolling interactions.Bioscience reports · 2012Article
- Article
- Estimating developmental states of tumors and normal tissues using a linear time-ordered model.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Non-genetic heterogeneity of cells in development: more than just noise.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2009Review
- Systems biology of stem cell fate and cellular reprogramming.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe process of cellular differentiation is governed by complex dynamical biomolecular networks consisting of a multitude of genes and their products acting in concert to determine a particular cell fate. Thus, a systems level view is necessary for understanding how a cell coordinates this process and for developing effective therapeutic strategies to treat diseases, such as cancer, in which differentiation plays a significant role. Theoretical considerations and recent experimental evidence support the view that cell fates are high dimensional attractor states of the underlying molecular networks. The temporal behavior of the network states progressing toward different cell fate attractors has the potential to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms governing differentiation.
resultsUsing the HL60 multipotent promyelocytic leukemia cell line, we performed experiments that ultimately led to two different cell fate attractors by two treatments of varying dosage and duration of the differentiation agent all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA). The dosage and duration combinations of the two treatments were chosen by means of flow cytometric measurements of CD11b, a well-known early differentiation marker, such that they generated two intermediate populations that were poised at the apparently same stage of differentiation. However, the population of one treatment proceeded toward the terminally differentiated neutrophil attractor while that of the other treatment reverted back toward the undifferentiated promyelocytic attractor. We monitored the gene expression changes in the two populations after their respective treatments over a period of five days and identified a set of genes that diverged in their expression, a subset of which promotes neutrophil differentiation while the other represses cell cycle progression. By employing promoter based transcription factor binding site analysis, we found enrichment in the set of divergent genes, of transcription factors functionally linked to tumor progression, cell cycle, and development.
conclusionSince many of the transcription factors identified by this approach are also known to be implicated in hematopoietic differentiation and leukemia, this study points to the utility of incorporating a dynamical systems level view into a computational analysis framework for elucidating transcriptional mechanisms regulating differentiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.