Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19222528›Full record

SynthesisDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2009

Phase I and II enzyme polymorphisms as risk factors for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

L M Bull, D L White, M Bray, Z Nurgalieva, H B El-Serag

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A newly identified susceptibility locus near FOXP1 modifies the association of gastroesophageal reflux with Barrett's esophagus.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Barrett's oesophagus: Evidence from the current meta-analyses.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2014
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L M BullBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
D L White
M Bray
Z Nurgalieva
H B El-Serag
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Genetic Epidemiology of HCV-related Liver DiseaseK01DK081736 · NIDDK · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI WHITE, DONNA LORRAINE · 2008 to 2012
$790k
NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK081736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although several studies have examined the association between phase I/II enzyme polymorphisms and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and/or Barrett's esophagus (BE), their overall findings remain unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether phase I/II polymorphisms are independent risk factors for either BE or EAC. We employed keyword searches in multiple databases to identify studies published before October 1, 2007. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) examined in > or =3 studies were meta-analyzed to obtain a pooled estimate of effect. Meta-analysis suggested the minor allele for GSTP1 Val(105) conveys modest excess risk (odds ratio [OR](BE)= 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-1.95; OR(EAC)= 1.20, 95% CI 0.94-1.54). No excess risk was observed with GSTM1 null (OR(BE)= 0.77, 95% CI: 0.56-1.08; OR(EAC)= 1.08, 95% CI: 0.79-1.48), GSTT1 null (OR(BE)= 1.35, 95% CI: 0.91-2.01; OR(EAC)= 0.84, 95% CI: 0.48-1.49), or CYP1A Val(462) (OR(EAC)= 0.89, 95% CI: 0.40-1.97). Insufficient data existed to meta-analyze remaining SNPs. Our review identified GSTP1(Ile105Val) as a possible risk factor for BE and EAC in Caucasian males. No excess risk was observed for other phase I/II polymorphisms with sufficient data to meta-analyze. Additional studies are needed to determine if GSTP1 conveys excess risk in females or non-Caucasians and to evaluate other phase I/II polymorphisms.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAdenocarcinomaBarrett EsophagusCase-Control StudiesEsophageal NeoplasmsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID19222528
PMCPMC4018839
OpenAlexW2114455060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.