Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19222472›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of haematology2009

Pharmacotherapy in sickle cell disease--state of the art and future prospects.

Jane Hankins, Banu Aygun

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of haematology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Hydroxyurea in sickle cell disease: drug review.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2014
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Common sense model of illness in youth with type 1 diabetes or sickle cell disease.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2011
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jane HankinsDepartment of Hematology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. jane.hankins@stjude.org
Banu Aygun
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · US

Funding

Y-Globin Gene Therapy Using In Vivo SelectionU54HL070590 · NHLBI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI WARE, RUSSELL E · 2003 to 2011
$13.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL070590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decade, the care of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) has undergone important advances with better understanding of disease pathophysiology and improvement in standards of care, especially among paediatric patients. Although many new drugs are currently being investigated and are at different stages of development, the pace of drug discovery and utilization has been slow and suboptimal. Hydroxycarbamide (hydroxyurea) has been investigated and utilized for at least two decades. Hydroxycarbamide's efficacy has been demonstrated, albeit with different levels of evidence, in paediatric and adult populations, and yet clinician and patient acceptance and use have been far from ideal. In this review we discuss the current usage of hydroxycarbamide and its possible future indications in SCD, as well as the use of new compounds that have very different mechanisms of action, which may prove safe and efficacious when used alone or in combination in patients with SCD.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellAntisickling AgentsClinical Trials as TopicErythropoietinHumansIon ChannelsVasodilator AgentsAntisickling AgentsErythropoietinIon ChannelsVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID19222472
PMCPMC3175763
OpenAlexW1975364175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.