Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19221847›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2009

Explorative investigation of biomarkers of brain damage and coagulation system activation in clinical stroke differentiation.

Johan Undén, Karin Strandberg, Jan Malm, Eric Campbell, Lars Rosengren, Johan Stenflo, Bo Norrving, Bertil Romner, Arne Lindgren, Gunnar Andsberg

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein as a biomarker for differentiating intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke in patients with symptoms of acute stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quantification and prospective evaluation of serum NfL and GFAP as blood-derived biomarkers of outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2023
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Liquid biopsy markers for stroke diagnosis.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The use of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein test as a promising tool for intracerebral hemorrhage diagnosis in Chinese patients and prediction of the short-term functional outcomes.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Biomarkers and acute brain injuries: interest and limits.Critical care (London, England) · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Glial fibrillary acidic protein as a brain injury biomarker in children undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2011
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Johan UndénDept. of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Halmstad Regional Hospital, 30185 Halmstad, Sweden. johan.unden@lthalland.se
Karin Strandberg
Jan Malm
Eric Campbell
Lars Rosengren
Johan Stenflo
Bo Norrving
Bertil Romner
Arne Lindgren
Gunnar Andsberg
Lund University · SEHallands sjukhus Halmstad · SEUmeå University · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA simple and accurate method of differentiating ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is potentially useful to facilitate acute therapeutic management. Blood measurements of biomarkers of brain damage and activation of the coagulation system may potentially serve as novel diagnostic tools for stroke subtypes.

methodsNinety-seven stroke patients were prospectively investigated in a multicenter design with blood levels of brain biomarkers S100B, neuron specific enolase (NSE), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) as well as a coagulation biomarker, activated protein C-protein C inhibitor complex (APC-PCI), within 24 hours of symptom onset.

resultsEighty-three patients (86%) had ischemic stroke and fourteen patients (14%) had ICH. There were no differences in S100B (p=0.13) and NSE (p=0.67) levels between patients with ischemic stroke or ICH. However, GFAP levels were significantly higher in ICH patients (p=0.0057). APC-PCI levels were higher in larger ischemic strokes (p=0.020). The combination of GFAP and APC-PCI levels, in patients with NIHSS score more than 3, had a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100% for ICH in our material (p=0.0052).

conclusionThis exploratory study indicated that blood levels of biomarkers GFAP and APC-PCI, prior to neuroimaging, may rule out ICH in a mixed stroke population.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersBrainBrain InjuriesBrain IschemiaCerebral HemorrhageDiagnosis, DifferentialEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve Growth FactorsPhosphopyruvate HydrataseProspective StudiesBiomarkersGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinNerve Growth FactorsPhosphopyruvate HydrataseProtein C InhibitorS100B protein, humanS100 Calcium Binding Protein beta SubunitS100 Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19221847
OpenAlexW2014354416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.