Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19221763›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of colorectal disease2009

Irinotecan as palliative chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: evolving tactics following initial treatment.

Emmanuel Mitry, Astrid Lièvre, Jean-Baptiste Bachet, Philippe Rougier

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of colorectal disease, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Colorectal cancer: Irinotecan therapy-following a trail of breadcrumbs?Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emmanuel MitryHépatogastroentérologie et oncologie digestive, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, 9 avenue Charles de Gaulle, 92100, Boulogne, France. emmanuel.mitry@apr.aphp.fr
Astrid Lièvre
Jean-Baptiste Bachet
Philippe Rougier

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who progress despite treatment with fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan or oxaliplatin have diminished survival, but they may derive clinically meaningful benefit from second-line or later chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsLiterature from 2000 through mid-2008 on the treatment of patients with unresectable mCRC was reviewed to identify options for chemotherapy-resistant patients with mCRC. RESULTS AND

conclusionsA recurring finding is that overall survival increases when patients are exposed to all available active agents throughout their course of care, independent of the line of treatment in which medication is delivered. Sequential administration of agents, including irinotecan, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, and cetuximab, or, alternatively, deferred administration of various medications in combination, have shown promising efficacy that is at least equivalent to established combination regimens with the same agents. Palliative chemotherapy clearly improves survival in patients with unresectable mCRC, with overall survival recently reaching 28 months.

Indexed as

Palliative CareAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCamptothecinColorectal NeoplasmsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansIrinotecanNeoplasm MetastasisCamptothecinIrinotecan

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.