Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19221503›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2009

Mitotic bookmarking of formerly active genes: keeping epigenetic memories from fading.

Kevin D Sarge, Ok-Kyong Park-Sarge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mitotic bookmarking by transcription factors.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2013
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kevin D SargeDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40536, USA. kdsarge@uky.edu
Ok-Kyong Park-Sarge

Funding

Regulation of HSF1 and HSF2 by SUMO-1 ModificationR01GM064606 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI SARGE, KEVIN D · 2003 to 2007
$1.1M
REGULATION OF PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 2A BY CELLULAR PROTEINR01GM061053 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI SARGE, KEVIN D · 2001 to 2004
$841k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM64606NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061053NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM064606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order for cell lineages to be maintained, daughter cells must have the same patterns of gene expression as the cells from which they were divided so that they can have the same phenotypes. However, during mitosis transcription ceases, chromosomal DNA is compacted, and most sequence-specific binding factors dissociate from DNA, making it difficult to understand how the "memory" of gene expression patterns is remembered and propagated to daughter cells. The process of remembering patterns of active gene expression during mitosis for transmission to daughter cells is called gene bookmarking. Here we discuss current knowledge concerning the factors and mechanisms involved in mediating gene bookmarking, including recent results on the mechanism by which the general transcription factor TBP participates in the mitotic bookmarking of formerly active genes.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticGene ExpressionPromoter Regions, GeneticAdenosine TriphosphatasesAnimalsBase SequenceDNA-Binding ProteinsHumansMitosisMultiprotein ComplexesTranscription FactorsAdenosine Triphosphatasescondensin complexesDNA-Binding ProteinsMultiprotein ComplexesTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID19221503
PMCPMC2748302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.