ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2009
Molecular determinants and evolutionary dynamics of wobble splicing.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alternative splicing at tandem splice sites (wobble splicing) is widespread in many species, but the mechanisms specifying the tandem sites remain poorly understood. Here, we used synaptotagmin I as a model to analyze the phylogeny of wobble splicing spanning more than 300 My of insect evolution. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the occurrence of species-specific wobble splicing was related to synonymous variation at tandem splice sites. Further mutagenesis experiments demonstrated that wobble splicing could be lost by artificially induced synonymous point mutations due to destruction of splice acceptor sites. In contrast, wobble splicing could not be correctly restored through mimicking an ancestral tandem acceptor by artificial synonymous mutation in in vivo splicing assays, which suggests that artificial tandem splice sites might be incompatible with normal wobble splicing. Moreover, combining comparative genomics with hybrid minigene analysis revealed that alternative splicing has evolved from the 3' tandem donor to the 5' tandem acceptor in Culex pipiens, as a result of an evolutionary shift of cis element sequences from 3' to 5' splice sites. These data collectively suggest that the selection of tandem splice sites might not simply be an accident of history but rather in large part the result of coevolution between splice site and cis element sequences as a basis for wobble splicing. An evolutionary model of wobble splicing is proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.