Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19220830›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental immunology2009

Protein biochip array technology to monitor rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis.

S Fabre, C Guisset, L Tatem, N Dossat, A M Dupuy, J D Cohen, J P Cristol, J P Daures, C Jorgensen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Towards Personalized Medicine in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Biomarker profiling of plasma samples utilizing RANDOX biochip array technology.International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology · 2017
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Cytokines as biomarkers in rheumatoid arthritis.Mediators of inflammation · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Recent advances in neutralizing the IL-6 pathway in arthritis.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

S FabreImmuno-rheumatology, Lapeyronie University Hospital, Montpellier, France. s-fabre@chu-montpellier.fr
C Guisset
L Tatem
N Dossat
A M Dupuy
J D Cohen
J P Cristol
J P Daures
C Jorgensen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) there are currently no good indicators to predict a clinical response to rituximab. The purpose of this study was to monitor and determine the role of peripheral blood cytokine profiling in differentiating between a good versus poor response to rituximab in RA. Blood samples were collected at baseline and at 3 months from 46 RA patients who were treated with rituximab. Responders are defined by the presence of three of four American College of Rheumatology criteria: >or=20% decrease in C-reactive protein, visual analogical score of disease activity, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and improvement of the disease activity score (28) (four values) by >or=1.2 obtained at 3 months. Twelve cytokines were measured from serum collected on days 0 and 90 by proteomic array, including interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumour necrosis factor-alpha, IL-1a, IL-1b, IL-2, IL-8, interferon-gamma, IL-4, IL-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, epidermal growth factor and vascular growth factor. We showed that C-reactive protein and IL-6 levels decrease significantly at 3 months in the responder group compared with baseline. At day 90 we identified a cytokine profile which differentiates responders and non-responders. High serum levels of two proinflammatory cytokines, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and epidermal growth factor, were significantly higher in the responder group at day 90 compared with non-responders. However, we were not able to identify a baseline cytokine profile predictive of a good response at 3 months. These findings suggest that cytokine profiling by proteomic analysis may be a promising tool for monitoring rituximab and may help in the future to identify responder RA patients.

Indexed as

Protein Array AnalysisAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBlood SedimentationChemokine CCL2C-Reactive ProteinCytokinesEpidermal Growth FactorHumansInterleukin-6Logistic ModelsMiddle AgedRituximabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntirheumatic AgentsChemokine CCL2C-Reactive ProteinCytokinesEpidermal Growth FactorInterleukin-6Rituximab

Identifiers

PMID19220830
PMCPMC2669515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.