ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2009
Neutral antagonist activity of naltrexone and 6beta-naltrexol in naïve and opioid-dependent C6 cells expressing a mu-opioid receptor.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determining pharmacological selectivity of the kappa opioid receptor antagonist LY2456302 using pupillometry as a translational biomarker in rat and human.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2014Trial
- Naltrexone, Naloxone, Morphine, and Fentanyl Pharmacologically Chaperone a Mutant μ-Opioid Receptor via an Endoplasmic Reticulum Exit Site-Dependent Pathway.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Article
- Modulation of μ-opioid receptor activation by acidic pH is dependent on ligand structure and an ionizable amino acid residue.British journal of pharmacology · 2019Article
- Article
- Constitutive Desensitization of Opioid Receptors in Peripheral Sensory Neurons.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2016Article
- The opioid receptor pharmacology of GSK1521498 compared to other ligands with differential effects on compulsive reward-related behaviours.Psychopharmacology · 2015Article
- The discovery and development of the N-substituted trans-3,4-dimethyl-4-(3'-hydroxyphenyl)piperidine class of pure opioid receptor antagonists.ChemMedChem · 2014Review
- Ligand interaction, binding site and G protein activation of the mu opioid receptor.European journal of pharmacology · 2013Article
- Regulation of μ-opioid receptors: desensitization, phosphorylation, internalization, and tolerance.Pharmacological reviews · 2013Review
- μ-Opioid receptors and regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins: from a symposium on new concepts in mu-opioid pharmacology.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2012Review
- Analgesic tone conferred by constitutively active mu opioid receptors in mice lacking β-arrestin 2.Molecular pain · 2011Article
- In vivo characterization of the opioid antagonist nalmefene in mice.Life sciences · 2010Article
- GPCR theme editorial.British journal of pharmacology · 2009Article
- Differential effect of membrane cholesterol removal on mu- and delta-opioid receptors: a parallel comparison of acute and chronic signaling to adenylyl cyclase.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2009Article
- Shadows across mu-Star? Constitutively active mu-opioid receptors revisited.British journal of pharmacology · 2009Article
- Endogenous analgesia, dependence, and latent pain sensitization.Current topics in behavioral neurosciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeAdenylyl cyclase sensitization occurs on chronic agonist activation of mu-opioid receptors and is manifested by an increase in cAMP levels (overshoot) on challenge with antagonist. It has been proposed that a long lasting constitutively active receptor is formed on chronic mu-opioid exposure and that antagonists with inverse agonist activity rapidly return the receptor to a basal state causing a cAMP overshoot and a more severe withdrawal response in vivo. This hypothesis depends on an accurate characterization of neutral and inverse agonist properties of opioid antagonists. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: C6 glioma and HEK293 cells expressing mu-opioid receptors were used. Opioid antagonists were examined for their ability to induce a cAMP overshoot following chronic treatment with the agonist DAMGO ([D-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4),Glyol(5)]-enkephalin). The compounds were also characterized as agonists, inverse agonists or neutral antagonists by using assays for competitive binding, [(35)S]GTPgammaS (guanosine-5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate) binding and changes in cell surface receptor expression. KEY
resultsNaltrexone, 6beta-naltrexol and naloxone were indistinguishable to the mu-opioid receptor in the opioid-naïve or dependent state and acted as neutral antagonists. The delta-opioid receptor inverse agonist RTI-5989-25 [(+)-N-[trans-4'-(2-methylphenyl)-2'-butenyl]-(3R,4R)-dimethyl-4-(3-hydroxyphenyl)piperidine], a 3,4-dimethyl-4-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-piperidine, was an inverse agonist at the mu-opioid receptor, and the peptide antagonist CTAP (H-D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH(2)) showed variable, assay-dependent properties. All the antagonists precipitated the same degree of cAMP overshoot in opioid-dependent cells. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Antagonists at the mu-opioid receptor may be neutral or show inverse agonist activity. Formation of a constitutively active mu-opioid receptor is not a requirement for the development or expression of adenylyl cyclase sensitization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.