Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19220274›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2009

Co-medication of statins and CYP3A4 inhibitors before and after introduction of new reimbursement policy.

Helene M Devold, Espen Molden, Svetlana Skurtveit, Kari Furu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Caution is Needed in Designing Pharmacy Coverage.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Helene M DevoldDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.b. 4404 Nydalen, Oslo, Norway. helene.devold@fhi.no
Espen Molden
Svetlana Skurtveit
Kari Furu
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NOUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

what is already known about this subjectHMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are frequently used drugs in the treatment of dyslipidaemia. Co-medication with interacting drugs increases the risk of statin-induced muscular side-effects. Simvastatin exhibits particularly high interaction potential due to substantial metabolism via cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: In June 2005, a new reimbursement policy was introduced by the Norwegian Medicines Agency stating that simvastatin should be prescribed as first-line lipid-lowering therapy. Following introduction of the new policy, the number of patients co-medicated with simvastatin and CYP3A4 inhibitors almost doubled. A potential consequence is increased incidence of muscular side-effects in the statin-treated population.

aimsTo assess the prevalence of co-medication of statins and CYP3A4 inhibitors before and after introduction of a new Norwegian reimbursement policy, which states that all patients should be prescribed simvastatin as first-line lipid-lowering therapy.

methodsData from patients receiving simvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin or atorvastatin in 2004 and 2006, including co-medication of potent CYP3A4 inhibitors, were retrieved from the Norwegian Prescription Database covering the total population of Norway. Key measurements were prevalence of continuous statin use (two or more prescriptions on one statin) and proportions of different statin types among all patients and those co-medicated with CYP3A4 inhibitors.

resultsIn 2004, 5.9% (n= 272 342) of the Norwegian population received two or more prescriptions on one statin compared with 7.0% (n= 324 267) in 2006. The relative number of simvastatin users increased from 39.7% (n= 112 122) in 2004 to 63.1% (n= 226 672) in 2006. A parallel increase was observed within the subpopulation co-medicated with statins and CYP3A4 inhibitors, i.e. from 42.9% (n= 7706) in 2004 to 63.6% (n= 13 367) in 2006. For all other statins the number of overall users decreased to a similar extent to those co-medicated with CYP3A4 inhibitors.

conclusionsIn both 2004 and 2006, the choice of statin type did not depend on whether the patient used a CYP3A4 inhibitor or not. Considering the pronounced interaction potential of simvastatin with CYP3A4 inhibitors, a negative influence of the new policy on overall statin safety seems likely.

Indexed as

Reimbursement MechanismsAnticholesteremic AgentsCombined Modality TherapyCytochrome P-450 CYP3ACytochrome P-450 CYP3A InhibitorsHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsNorwayPractice Patterns, Physicians'SimvastatinAnticholesteremic AgentsCYP3A4 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP3ACytochrome P-450 CYP3A InhibitorsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsSimvastatin

Identifiers

PMID19220274
PMCPMC2670381
OpenAlexW2077224577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.