Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19219634›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2009

Spatial cluster analysis of early stage breast cancer: a method for public health practice using cancer registry data.

Jaymie R Meliker, Geoffrey M Jacquez, Pierre Goovaerts, Glenn Copeland, May Yassine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Choropleth map design for cancer incidence, part 2.Preventing chronic disease · 2010
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jaymie R MelikerGraduate Program in Public Health, Department of Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8338, USA. jrmeliker@gmail.com
Geoffrey M Jacquez
Pierre Goovaerts
Glenn Copeland
May Yassine

Funding

NAT'L CANCER PREV & CONTROL PROG (COMPONENTS: MI COMPREH CANCER CONTR PROG, MI BRU58DP000812 · DP · MICHIGAN STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES · PI BROOKOVER, PATRICIA · 2007 to 2011
$51.4M
Cancer Cluster MorphologyR43CA112743 · NCI · BIOMEDWARE · PI JACQUEZ, GEOFFREY M. · 2006 to 2006
$100k
Case-only Cancer Clustering for Mobile PopulationsR43CA135818 · NCI · BIOMEDWARE · PI JACQUEZ, GEOFFREY M. · 2008 to 2008
$100k
Geostatistical software for the boundary analysis of cancer mapsR43CA135814 · NCI · BIOMEDWARE · PI GOOVAERTS, PIERRE E · 2008 to 2008
$100k
Geostatistical software for the analysis of individual-level epidemiologic dataR43CA132347 · NCI · BIOMEDWARE · PI GOOVAERTS, PIERRE E · 2007 to 2007
$100k
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 5U58DP000812NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP000812NCI NIH HHS 1R43CA112743NCI NIH HHS 1R43CA132347NCI NIH HHS 1R43CA135818NCI NIH HHS R43 CA112743NCI NIH HHS R43 CA132347NCI NIH HHS R43 CA135814NCI NIH HHS R43 CA135818
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCancer registries are increasingly mapping residences of patients at time of diagnosis, however, an accepted protocol for spatial analysis of these data is lacking. We undertook a public health practice-research partnership to develop a strategy for detecting spatial clusters of early stage breast cancer using registry data.

methodsSpatial patterns of early stage breast cancer throughout Michigan were analyzed comparing several scales of spatial support, and different clustering algorithms.

resultsAnalyses relying on point data identified spatial clusters not detected using data aggregated into census block groups, census tracts, or legislative districts. Further, using point data, Cuzick-Edwards' nearest neighbor test identified clusters not detected by the SaTScan spatial scan statistic. Regression and simulation analyses lent credibility to these findings.

conclusionsIn these cluster analyses of early stage breast cancer in Michigan, spatial analyses of point data are more sensitive than analyses relying on data aggregated into polygons, and the Cuzick-Edwards' test is more sensitive than the SaTScan spatial scan statistic, with acceptable Type I error. Cuzick-Edwards' test also enables presentation of results in a manner easily communicated to public health practitioners. The approach outlined here should help cancer registries conduct and communicate results of geographic analyses.

Indexed as

DemographyRegistriesBreast NeoplasmsCarcinomaCluster AnalysisFemaleGeographic Information SystemsGeographyHumansPopulation Surveillance

Identifiers

PMID19219634
PMCPMC4337842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.