Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19219413›Full record

ArticleDer Anaesthesist2009

[Prehospital obstetrical emergencies in a physician-staffed ground-based emergency service. A retrospective analysis over a 5-year period].

M Bernhard, N Freerksen, C Hainer, J Rom, R Schreckenberger, C Sohn, E Martin, H Maul

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Initial preclinical assessment on-site].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M BernhardSektion Notfallmedizin, Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Deutschland. Michael.Bernhard@med.uni-heidelberg.de
N Freerksen
C Hainer
J Rom
R Schreckenberger
C Sohn
E Martin
H Maul
University Hospital Heidelberg · DEHeidelberg University · DEFrauenklinik Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the German emergency medical system (EMS) obstetrical emergencies are rarely encountered, but are highly emotional situations for all concerned and form a special challenge for the emergency physician. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, the course and the performance of rescue missions in a ground-based EMS system.

methodsIn a retrospective study the prehospital emergency charts concerning obstetrical emergencies over a 5-year period (10/2002-09/2007) were analysed.

resultsA total of 40 physician-staffed rescue missions with obstetrical emergencies were identified. On average seven rescue missions were performed per year. The majority of cases with 73% of the rescue missions was performed during the night service (16:00-07:00 h). On average the emergency patients (26th-41st week of gestation) were classified by the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) score as NACA III. Of the 40 obstetrical emergencies delivery occurred out of hospital in 18 cases (33rd-41st week of gestation), while the emergency physician was present in only 3 cases during childbirth. In 15 cases prehospital childbirth took place in the domestic environment of the patient, in 2 cases in an ambulance and in 1 case in the medical office of a gynecologist. In 20 cases the pregnant women were transported to hospital while labor had already begun. The emergency physicians on scene applied intravenous access, guided through labor and delivery, and administered tocolysis and in cases of prehospital delivery the emergency physicians also applied oxytocin, cut the umbilical cord and performed primary care of the newborn.

conclusionsObstetrical emergencies are rare but recurrent in the ground-based EMS. However, prehospital management of women in labor, supervision of spontaneous prehospital delivery and the initial management of a newborn form a challenge for the emergency physician responsible. Consequently, prehospital management of obstetrical emergencies needs intensive consideration during education and training of emergency medical personnel.

Indexed as

AdultDelivery, ObstetricEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleGermanyGynecologyHumansInfant, NewbornLabor, ObstetricObstetricsOxytocicsOxytocinParturitionPhysiciansPostpartum PeriodPregnancyOxytocicsOxytocin

Identifiers

PMID19219413
OpenAlexW2213015149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.