ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2009
Isolation and characterization of metalloproteases with a novel domain structure by construction and screening of metagenomic libraries.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel Nematode-Killing Protein-1 (Nkp-1) from a Marine Epiphytic BacteriumBiomedicines · 2021Article
- Microbial proteases: ubiquitous enzymes with innumerable uses.3 Biotech · 2021Review
- Structural-genetic insight and optimization of protease production from a novel strain of Aeromonas veronii CMF, a gut isolate of Chrysomya megacephala.Archives of microbiology · 2021Article
- Two-step functional screen on multiple proteinaceous substrates reveals temperature-robust proteases with a broad-substrate range.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Substrate preferences, phylogenetic and biochemical properties of proteolytic bacteria present in the digestive tract of Nile tilapia (AIMS microbiology · 2021Article
- Biochemical Characteristics of Microbial Enzymes and Their Significance from Industrial Perspectives.Molecular biotechnology · 2019Review
- Recovery and functional validation of hidden soil enzymes in metagenomic libraries.MicrobiologyOpen · 2019Article
- Article
- Recent Advances in Function-based Metagenomic Screening.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2018Review
- Culture-independent method for identification of microbial enzyme-encoding genes by activity-based single-cell sequencing using a water-in-oil microdroplet platform.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Discovery of new protein families and functions: new challenges in functional metagenomics for biotechnologies and microbial ecology.Frontiers in microbiology · 2015Review
- Current functional metagenomic approaches only expand the existing protease sequence space, but does not presently add any novelty to it.Current microbiology · 2015Article
- Remote homology and the functions of metagenomic dark matter.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Article
- Metagenomics: Retrospect and Prospects in High Throughput Age.Biotechnology research international · 2015Review
- Emerging strategies and integrated systems microbiology technologies for biodiscovery of marine bioactive compounds.Marine drugs · 2014Review
- Microbial diversity and biochemical potential encoded by thermal spring metagenomes derived from the Kamchatka Peninsula.Archaea (Vancouver, B.C.) · 2013Article
- Isolation and characterization of a novel endoglucanase from a Bursaphelenchus xylophilus metagenomic library.PloS one · 2013Article
- Identification and characterization of novel cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic genes and enzymes derived from German grassland soil metagenomes.Biotechnology letters · 2012Article
- The great screen anomaly--a new frontier in product discovery through functional metagenomics.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2012Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small-insert metagenomic libraries from four samples were constructed by a topoisomerase-based and a T4 DNA ligase-based approach. Direct comparison of both approaches revealed that application of the topoisomerase-based method resulted in a higher number of insert-containing clones per microg of environmental DNA used for cloning and a larger average insert size. Subsequently, the constructed libraries were partially screened for the presence of genes conferring proteolytic activity. The function-driven screen was based on the ability of the library-containing Escherichia coli clones to form halos on skim milk-containing agar plates. The screening of 80,000 E. coli clones yielded four positive clones. Two of the plasmids (pTW2 and pTW3) recovered from positive clones conferred strong proteolytic activity and were studied further. Analysis of the entire insert sequences of pTW2 (28,113 bp) and pTW3 (19,956 bp) suggested that the DNA fragments were derived from members of the genus Xanthomonas. Each of the plasmids harbored one gene (2,589 bp) encoding a metalloprotease (mprA, pTW2; mprB, pTW3). Sequence and biochemical analyses revealed that MprA and MprB are similar extracellular proteases belonging to the M4 family of metallopeptidases (thermolysin-like family). Both enzymes possessed a unique modular structure and consisted of four regions: the signal sequence, the N-terminal proregion, the protease region, and the C-terminal extension. The architecture of the latter region, which was characterized by the presence of two prepeptidase C-terminal domains and one proprotein convertase P domain, is novel for bacterial metalloproteases. Studies with derivatives of MprA and MprB revealed that the C-terminal extension is not essential for protease activity. The optimum pH and temperature of both proteases were 8.0 and 65 degrees C, respectively, when casein was used as substrate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.