ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2009
Improving data quality control in quality improvement projects.
Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Evaluating the effectiveness of a tailored multifaceted performance feedback intervention to improve the quality of care: protocol for a cluster randomized trial in intensive care.Implementation science : IS · 2011Trial
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Mobilization Alarms for Prevention of Falls in Hospital.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Review
- Towards improving maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response in the African region: an analysis of 25 countries from 2015 until 2022.BMJ global health · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- A mixed-methods study of challenges experienced by clinical teams in measuring improvement.BMJ quality & safety · 2021Article
- A Novel Experiential Quality Improvement Training Program During Residency Improves Quality Improvement Confidence and Knowledge: a Prospective Cohort Study.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2020Article
- A modified Delphi study to identify the features of high quality measurement plans for healthcare improvement projects.BMC medical research methodology · 2020Article
- Perspective on Publishing Quality Improvement Efforts.The Permanente journal · 2017Article
- Improvement Science in Anaesthesia.Current anesthesiology reports · 2017Review
- Multimethod study of a large-scale programme to improve patient safety using a harm-free care approach.BMJ open · 2016Article
- Error rates in a clinical data repository: lessons from the transition to electronic data transfer--a descriptive study.BMJ open · 2013Article
- Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation's programme evaluations and relevant literature.BMJ quality & safety · 2012Article
- What is the value and impact of quality and safety teams? A scoping review.Implementation science : IS · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe results of many quality improvement (QI) projects are gaining wide-spread attention. Policy-makers, hospital leaders and clinicians make important decisions based on the assumption that QI project results are accurate. However, compared with clinical research, QI projects are typically conducted with substantially fewer resources, potentially impacting data quality. Our objective was to provide a primer on basic data quality control methods appropriate for QI efforts.
methodsData quality control methods should be applied throughout all phases of a QI project. In the design phase, project aims should guide data collection decisions, emphasizing quality (rather than quantity) of data and considering resource limitations. In the data collection phase, standardized data collection forms, comprehensive staff training and a well-designed database can help maximize the quality of the data. Clearly defined data elements, quality assurance reviews of both collection and entry and system-based controls reduce the likelihood of error. In the data management phase, missing data should be quickly identified and corrected with system-based controls to minimize the missing data. Finally, in the data analysis phase, appropriate statistical methods and sensitivity analysis aid in managing and understanding the effects of missing data and outliers, in addressing potential confounders and in conveying the precision of results.
conclusionData quality control is essential to ensure the integrity of results from QI projects. Feasible methods are available and important to help ensure that stakeholder's decisions are based on accurate data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.