Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19218334›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2009

Improving data quality control in quality improvement projects.

Dale M Needham, David J Sinopoli, Victor D Dinglas, Sean M Berenholtz, Radha Korupolu, Sam R Watson, Lisa Lubomski, Christine Goeschel, Peter J Pronovost

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Novel Experiential Quality Improvement Training Program During Residency Improves Quality Improvement Confidence and Knowledge: a Prospective Cohort Study.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Improvement Science in Anaesthesia.Current anesthesiology reports · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dale M NeedhamPulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. dale.needham@jhmi.edu
David J Sinopoli
Victor D Dinglas
Sean M Berenholtz
Radha Korupolu
Sam R Watson
Lisa Lubomski
Christine Goeschel
Peter J Pronovost

Funding

Statewide Efforts to Improve Care in Intensive Care UnitUC1HS014246 · AHRQ · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PRONOVOST, PETER J · 2003 to 2004
–
AHRQ HHS 1UC1 HS 14246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe results of many quality improvement (QI) projects are gaining wide-spread attention. Policy-makers, hospital leaders and clinicians make important decisions based on the assumption that QI project results are accurate. However, compared with clinical research, QI projects are typically conducted with substantially fewer resources, potentially impacting data quality. Our objective was to provide a primer on basic data quality control methods appropriate for QI efforts.

methodsData quality control methods should be applied throughout all phases of a QI project. In the design phase, project aims should guide data collection decisions, emphasizing quality (rather than quantity) of data and considering resource limitations. In the data collection phase, standardized data collection forms, comprehensive staff training and a well-designed database can help maximize the quality of the data. Clearly defined data elements, quality assurance reviews of both collection and entry and system-based controls reduce the likelihood of error. In the data management phase, missing data should be quickly identified and corrected with system-based controls to minimize the missing data. Finally, in the data analysis phase, appropriate statistical methods and sensitivity analysis aid in managing and understanding the effects of missing data and outliers, in addressing potential confounders and in conveying the precision of results.

conclusionData quality control is essential to ensure the integrity of results from QI projects. Feasible methods are available and important to help ensure that stakeholder's decisions are based on accurate data.

Indexed as

CatheterizationCross InfectionData CollectionHumansMedical ErrorsMichiganOrganizational Case StudiesQuality Assurance, Health CareSafety ManagementTotal Quality Management

Identifiers

PMID19218334
PMCPMC2734082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.