ArticleBMC health services research2009
"Will they just pack up and leave?" - attitudes and intended behaviour of hospital health care workers during an influenza pandemic.
Article in BMC health services research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.
- Barriers and Facilitators of Nurses' and Physicians' Willingness to Work during a Respiratory Disease Outbreak: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Implications for COVID-19: A systematic review of nurses' experiences of working in acute care hospital settings during a respiratory pandemic.International journal of nursing studies · 2020Pooled it
- A systematic review of factors affecting intended and actual adherence with antiviral medication as treatment or prophylaxis in seasonal and pandemic flu.Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2016Pooled it
- Healthcare workers' willingness to work during an influenza pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2015Pooled it
- Evaluation of a Web-based intervention to promote hand hygiene: exploratory randomized controlled trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2011Trial
- Psychological experiences of nurses caring for patients with COVID-19: Integrative review based on qualitative research.Nursing open · 2023Review
- Willingness to Work during Public Health Emergencies: A Systematic Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The context, contribution and consequences of addressing the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative exploration of executive nurses' perspectives.Journal of advanced nursing · 2022Article
- The effect of COVID-19 on schoolteachers' emotional reactions and mental health: longitudinal results from the CLASS study.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2022Article
- Narratives of hospital health care professionals during the pandemic in the Northern Philippines: A phenomenological study.Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa) · 2022Article
- Development and psychometric properties of health care workers' concerns in infectious outbreaks scale.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- The psychological outcomes of COVID-19 affected the pandemic-after risk perceptions of nurse clinicians: a latent profile analysis.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2022Article
- Patient safety, quality of care and missed nursing care at a cardiology department during the COVID-19 outbreak.Nursing open · 2022Article
- Workplace Well-Being and Intent to Stay by Health Care Workers Reassigned during the First COVID-19 Wave: Results of a Swiss Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Nurses Who Are More Willing to Participate in the Fight against COVID-19: Evidence from China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- COVID-19 and Moroccan nursing students: A multicentre cross-sectional survey on their related knowledge, attitudes and practices.Nursing open · 2021Article
- Article
- Nurses' experiences of being recruited and transferred to a new sub-intensive care unit devoted to COVID-19 patients.Journal of nursing management · 2021Article
- Article
- Healthcare providers' challenges during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: A qualitative approach.Nursing & health sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is a general consensus that another influenza pandemic is inevitable. Although health care workers (HCWs) are essential to the health system response, there are few studies exploring HCW attitudes to pandemic influenza. The aim of this study was to explore HCWs knowledge, attitudes and intended behaviour towards pandemic influenza.
methodsCross-sectional investigation of a convenience sample of clinical and non-clinical HCWs from two tertiary-referral teaching hospitals in Sydney, Australia was conducted between June 4 and October 19, 2007. The self-administered questionnaire was distributed to hospital personal from 40 different wards and departments. The main outcome measures were intentions regarding work attendance and quarantine, antiviral use and perceived preparation.
resultsRespondents were categorized into four main groups by occupation: Nursing (47.5%), Medical (26.0%), Allied (15.3%) and Ancillary (11.2%). Our study found that most HCWs perceived pandemic influenza to be very serious (80.9%, n = 873) but less than half were able to correctly define it (43.9%, n = 473). Only 24.8% of respondents believed their department to be prepared for a pandemic, but nonetheless most were willing to work during a pandemic if a patient or colleague had influenza. The main determinants of variation in our study were occupational factors, demographics and health beliefs. Non-clinical staff were significantly most likely to be unsure of their intentions (OR 1.43, p < 0.001). Only 42.5% (n = 459) of respondents considered that neuraminidase inhibitor antiviral medications (oseltamivir/zanamivir) would protect them against pandemic influenza, whereas 77.5% (n = 836) believed that vaccination would be of benefit.
conclusionWe identified two issues that could undermine the best of pandemic plans - the first, a low level of confidence in antivirals as an effective measure; secondly, that non-clinical workers are an overlooked group whose lack of knowledge and awareness could undermine pandemic plans. Other issues included a high level of confidence in dietary measures to protect against influenza, and a belief among ancillary workers that antibiotics would be protective. All health care worker strategies should include non clinical and ancillary staff to ensure adequate business continuity for hospitals. HCW education, psychosocial support and staff communication could improve knowledge of appropriate pandemic interventions and confidence in antivirals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.