ArticleGenome biology2009
Asymmetric relationships between proteins shape genome evolution.
Article in Genome biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolutionary design principles in metabolism.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Review
- Evolution of complex adaptations in molecular systems.Nature ecology & evolution · 2017Article
- Adaptive evolution of complex innovations through stepwise metabolic niche expansion.Nature communications · 2016Article
- Practical aspects of protein co-evolution.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2014Review
- Basic and applied uses of genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions of Escherichia coli.Molecular systems biology · 2013Review
- Genome evolution predicts genetic interactions in protein complexes and reveals cancer drug targets.Nature communications · 2013Article
- Shared protein complex subunits contribute to explaining disrupted co-occurrence.PLoS computational biology · 2013Article
- Studying the relationship between robustness against mutations in metabolic networks and lifestyle of organisms.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2013Article
- FOCAL: an experimental design tool for systematizing metabolic discoveries and model development.Genome biology · 2012Article
- F2C2: a fast tool for the computation of flux coupling in genome-scale metabolic networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Systems biology of lactic acid bacteria: a critical review.Microbial cell factories · 2011Review
- Systems-biology approaches for predicting genomic evolution.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2011Review
- FFCA: a feasibility-based method for flux coupling analysis of metabolic networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Metabolic modeling of endosymbiont genome reduction on a temporal scale.Molecular systems biology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe relationships between proteins are often asymmetric: one protein (A) depends for its function on another protein (B), but the second protein does not depend on the first. In metabolic networks there are multiple pathways that converge into one central pathway. The enzymes in the converging pathways depend on the enzymes in the central pathway, but the enzymes in the latter do not depend on any specific enzyme in the converging pathways. Asymmetric relations are analogous to the "if->then" logical relation where A implies B, but B does not imply A (A->B).
resultsWe show that the majority of relationships between enzymes in metabolic flux models of metabolism in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae are asymmetric. We show furthermore that these asymmetric relationships are reflected in the expression of the genes encoding those enzymes, the effect of gene knockouts and the evolution of genomes. From the asymmetric relative dependency, one would expect that the gene that is relatively independent (B) can occur without the other dependent gene (A), but not the reverse. Indeed, when only one gene of an A->B pair is expressed, is essential, is present in a genome after an evolutionary gain or loss, it tends to be the independent gene (B). This bias is strongest for genes encoding proteins whose asymmetric relationship is evolutionarily conserved.
conclusionsThe asymmetric relations between proteins that arise from the system properties of metabolic networks affect gene expression, the relative effect of gene knockouts and genome evolution in a predictable manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.