Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19216536›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2009

Intracellular adaptation of Brucella abortus.

Julie Lamontagne, Anik Forest, Elena Marazzo, François Denis, Heather Butler, Jean-François Michaud, Lyne Boucher, Ida Pedro, Annie Villeneuve, Dmitri Sitnikov and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ability ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. ThemicroLife · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. TheAnnual review of microbiology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. TheFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Immuno-profiling ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  11. The mechanism of chronic intracellular infection withFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Proteomics ofMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  20. Proteomics of Brucella.Proteomes · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie LamontagneCaprion Proteomics, Inc., 7150 Alexander-Fleming, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4S 2C8.
Anik Forest
Elena Marazzo
François Denis
Heather Butler
Jean-François Michaud
Lyne Boucher
Ida Pedro
Annie Villeneuve
Dmitri Sitnikov
Karine Trudel
Najib Nassif
Djamila Boudjelti
Fadi Tomaki
Esteban Chaves-Olarte
Caterina Guzmán-Verri
Sylvain Brunet
Alexandra Côté-Martin
Joanna Hunter
Edgardo Moreno
Eustache Paramithiotis
Universidad de Costa Rica · CR

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN266200400056C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophages were infected with virulent Brucella abortus strain 2308 or attenuated strain 19. Intracellular bacteria were recovered at different times after infection and their proteomes compared. The virulent strain initially reduced most biosynthesis and altered its respiration; adaptations reversed later in infection. The attenuated strain was unable to match the magnitude of the virulent strain's adjustments. The results provide insight into mechanisms utilized by Brucella to establish intracellular infections.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsBrucella abortusCell LineChromatography, LiquidHumansMacrophagesProteomeTandem Mass SpectrometryBacterial ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID19216536
PMCPMC2771391
OpenAlexW1986889474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.