ArticleClinical cardiology2009
Cardiovascular studies and the radiation dose.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is calcium scoring of the coronary arteries necessary for proper management of asymptomatic subjects with classic risk factors?Clinical cardiology · 2010Article
- Where is the radiation history for the cardiac patient?Clinical cardiology · 2010Article
- Acute coronary syndrome in pregnancy.Clinical medicine. Cardiology · 2009Article
- Acute myocardial infarction during pregnancy: a clinical checkmate.Indian heart journalArticle
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In a previous editorial, I commented on ionizing radiation associated with multislice computed tomographic angiography and x-ray coronary angiography performed in the catheterization laboratory. I mentioned that just by living, all of us are exposed to a background radiation dose, probably in the neighborhood of 3.6 millisieverts per year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.