Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19214675›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2009

Gastric secretions affected by esophageal distention in the rat.

Seyyed Ali Mard, Mohammad Kazem Gharib Naseri, Mohammad Badavi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seyyed Ali MardDepartment of Physiology and Physiology Research Center, School of Medicine, Ahwaz Jundishapour University of Medical Sciences, Ahwaz 61335-189, Iran.
Mohammad Kazem Gharib Naseri
Mohammad Badavi
Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effect of esophageal distention (ED) on gastric motility has been well documented, but only a few investigations have been carried out about the effect of ED on gastric secretions. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of ED on gastric acid and pepsin secretions and the mechanisms involved.

methodsMale adult Wistar rats (200-240 g) were anesthetized by urethane [1.2 g/kg, intraperitoneally (i.p.)] and underwent tracheostomy and laparotomy. A catheter was inserted in the stomach through the duodenum for gastric washout and distention followed by the esophageal distention by a balloon (0.3 ml, 10 min). Gastric acid secretion was stimulated by gastric distension (1.5 ml/100 g body weight), pentagastrin (20 microg/kg, i.p.), or insulin (0.6 IU/kg, i.p.). Pepsin secretion was stimulated by carbachol (20 microg/kg, i.p.). Effects of cervical vagotomy and reserpine (1 mg/kg, i.p.) were also investigated.

resultsGastric distention-, pentagastrin-, and insulin-stimulated gastric acid secretion was reduced by esophageal distention (P < 0.001, P < 0.05, and P < 0.05, respectively). Carbachol-induced pepsin secretion was also attenuated by esophageal distention (P < 0.05). Cervical vagotomy abolished the inhibitory effect of ED on pentagastrin-induced gastric acid secretion. In reserpinized rats, ED reduced the basal gastric acid secretion (P < 0.05).

conclusionsThese results indicate that the vagus nerves are involved in the inhibitory effect of esophageal distension on gastric secretory function.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarbacholEsophagusGastric AcidGastric DilatationInsulinMalePentagastrinPepsin APeristalsisRatsRats, WistarReflexCarbacholInsulinPentagastrinPepsin A

Identifiers

PMID19214675
OpenAlexW2014437200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.