ArticlePlant cell reports2009
Differential expression of eight defensin genes of N. benthamiana following biotic stress, wounding, ethylene, and benzothiadiazole treatments.
Article in Plant cell reports, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Type 2 Nep1-Like Proteins from the Biocontrol OomyceteJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Bruchid egg induced transcript dynamics in developing seeds of black gram (Vigna mungo).PloS one · 2017Article
- Article
- Four plant defensins from an indigenous South African Brassicaceae species display divergent activities against two test pathogens despite high sequence similarity in the encoding genes.BMC research notes · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedChuthamat, A [corrected to Atnaseo, C]
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eight Nicotiana benthamiana defensin genes were identified that could be divided into two classes with class II defensins being longer than class I defensins due to an additional acidic C-terminal domain. Class I defensins were NbDef1.1, NbDef1.2, NbDef1.3, NbDef1.4, NbDef1.5, and NbDef1.6, and class II were Nbdef2.1 and NbDef2.2. Relative RT-PCR showed that NbDef1.1, NbDef1.2, and NbDef1.4 had relatively similar expression levels in healthy leaves, stems, roots, flowers, and seeds. However, Nbdef1.3, NbDef1.5, and NbDef1.6 had varying degrees of tissue specific expression, and Nbdef2.1 and NbDef2.2 had strictly flower-specific expression. None of the defensins were significantly induced by infection by Colletotrichum destructivum or C. orbiculare. However, infection by Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci resulted in increased expression of Nbdef1.2 and Nbdef2.2, and decreased expression of NbDef1.1, NbDef1.4, and NbDef1.6. In the hypersensitive response of N. benthamiana containing Pto with P. syringae pv. tabaci containing AvrPto, only NbDef2.2 was significantly up-regulated. Expression of the genes was also affected by abiotic treatments. Both wounding and ethylene treatments resulted in a strong induction of NbDef2.2 and a moderate to weak induction of NbDef1.1, NbDef1.2, and NbDef1.4. Only weak or no induction was observed with treatment with benzothiadiazole. The expression of these eight defensin genes demonstrates that only a small fraction of the members of a defensin gene family will respond to a particular hemibiotrophic pathogen as well as to abiotic stress or signaling molecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.