Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19212763›Full record

ArticleImmunogenetics2009

The chicken BF1 (classical MHC class I) gene shows evidence of selection for diversity in expression and in promoter and signal peptide regions.

Ann Marie O'Neill, Emily J Livant, Sandra J Ewald

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Immunogenetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ann Marie O'NeillDepartment of Pathobiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Emily J Livant
Sandra J Ewald
Auburn University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chicken MHC B contains two classical class I genes, BF1 and BF2, with the exception of two related haplotypes lacking BF1 due to insertion/rearrangement. In light of functional specialization of BF1 and BF2 molecules, we were interested in evaluating their relative expression at the mRNA level. We evaluated several MHC haplotypes for class I gene expression by RT-quantitative PCR. BF1 transcript levels were approximately two- to fivefold lower than BF2, with the exception of one haplotype in which BF1 expression was very low. To investigate molecular explanations for differences in BF locus or allele expression, we determined nucleotide sequences of Enhancer A and proximal promoter elements of nine different BF1 alleles, as well as their signal peptide sequences. Results showed that all BF1 alleles exhibit conservation of most of the identified promoter elements, but divergence from the Enhancer A sequence identified in the more highly expressed BF2 locus. Nonetheless, extensive BF1 allelic polymorphism was found in the promoter region and in the signal peptide, with two strongly separated allelic lineages identified for both. Patterns of promoter lineages, signal peptide lineages, and exon 2 mature protein coding sequences in individual BF1 alleles suggest that recombination among these elements has contributed to diversification of BF1 alleles. Finally, identification of a novel inactivating mutation in one BF1 allele suggests past selective pressure to eliminate BF1 function.

Indexed as

Genes, MHC Class ISelection, GeneticAnimalsChickensExonsGene ExpressionGenetic VariationIntronsPolymorphism, GeneticPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein Sorting SignalsProtein Sorting Signals

Identifiers

PMID19212763
OpenAlexW1970463945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.