Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19212338›Full record

Trial reportLeukemia2009

Prognostic significance of minimal residual disease in infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated within the Interfant-99 protocol.

V H J Van der Velden, L Corral, M G Valsecchi, M W J C Jansen, P De Lorenzo, G Cazzaniga, E R Panzer-Grümayer, M Schrappe, A Schrauder, C Meyer and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Leukemia, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00015873 (International Collaborative Treatment Protocol for Infants Under One Year With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00015873 phase3completednot on this map

International Collaborative Treatment Protocol for Infants Under One Year With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

TypeinterventionalSponsorDutch Childhood Oncology GroupRan1999 to 2009Enrolled350ConditionsLeukemiaArmsasparaginase, cytarabine, mercaptopurine, methotrexate, prednisolone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Infant Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia-New Therapeutic Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

V H J Van der VeldenDepartment of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
L Corral
M G Valsecchi
M W J C Jansen
P De Lorenzo
G Cazzaniga
E R Panzer-Grümayer
M Schrappe
A Schrauder
C Meyer
R Marschalek
L L Nigro
M Metzler
G Basso
G Mann
M L Den Boer
A Biondi
R Pieters
J J M Van Dongen
Interfant-99 Study Group
Erasmus MC · NLUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITFondazione Matilde Tettamanti Menotti De Marchi · ITGoethe University Frankfurt · DESt Anna Children's Hospital · ATUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEErasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEStichting Kinderoncologie Nederland · NLUniversity of Catania · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

Medical Research Council G0300130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in infants younger than 1 year is a rare but relatively homogeneous disease ( approximately 80% MLL gene rearranged, approximately 70% CD10-negative) when compared with childhood and adult ALL. Several studies in children and adults with ALL have shown that minimal residual disease (MRD) status is a strong and independent prognostic factor. We therefore evaluated the prognostic significance of MRD in infant ALL. Ninety-nine infant patients treated according to the Interfant-99 protocol were included in this study. MRD was analyzed by real-time quantitative PCR analysis of rearranged immunoglobulin genes, T-cell receptor genes and MLL genes at various time points (TP) during therapy. Higher MRD levels at the end of induction (TP2) and consolidation (TP3) were significantly associated with lower disease-free survival. Combined MRD information at TP2 and TP3 allowed recognition of three patients groups that significantly differed in outcome. All MRD-high-risk patients (MRD levels > or =10(-4) at TP3; 26% of patients) relapsed. MRD-low-risk patients (MRD level <10(-4) at both TP2 and TP3) constituted 44% of patients and showed a relapse-rate of only 13%, whereas remaining patients (MRD-medium-risk patients; 30% of patients) had a relapse rate of 31%. Comparison between the current Interfant-06 stratification at diagnosis and the here presented MRD-based stratification showed that both stratifications recognized different subgroups of patients. These data indicate that MRD diagnostics has added value for recognition of risk groups in infant ALL and that MRD diagnostics can be used for treatment intervention in infant ALL as well.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFollow-Up StudiesGene RearrangementGenes, ImmunoglobulinHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMyeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia ProteinNeoplasm, ResidualPolymerase Chain ReactionPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaPrognosisReceptors, Antigen, T-CellRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseKMT2A protein, humanMyeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia ProteinReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID19212338
OpenAlexW1987538151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.