ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2009
Effects of the noradrenergic system in rat white matter exposed to oxygen-glucose deprivation in vitro.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuroprotective actions of norepinephrine in neurological diseases.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2024Review
- The optimal distance between two electrode tips during recording of compound nerve action potentials in the rat median nerve.Neural regeneration research · 2014Article
- Review
- Diffusion tensor imaging detected optic nerve injury correlates with decreased compound action potentials after murine retinal ischemia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2012Article
- Mechanisms of axonal injury: internodal nanocomplexes and calcium deregulation.Trends in molecular medicine · 2010Review
- Progressive multiple sclerosis.Seminars in immunopathology · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Norepinephrine (NE) is released in excess into the extracellular space during oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) in brain, increasing neuronal metabolism and aggravating glutamate excitoxicity. We used isolated rat optic nerve and spinal cord dorsal columns to determine whether the noradrenergic system influences axonal damage in white matter. Tissue was studied electrophysiologically by recording the compound action potential (CAP) before and after exposure to 60 min of OGD at 36 degrees C. Depleting catecholamine stores with reserpine was protective and improved CAP recovery after 1 h of reperfusion from 17% (control) to 35%. Adding NE during OGD decreased CAP recovery to 8%, and adding NE to reserpine during OGD eliminated the protective effect of the latter. Selective inhibitors of Na(+)-dependent norepinephrine transport desipramine and nisoxetine improved recovery to 58% and 44%, respectively. alpha2 adrenergic receptor agonists UK14,304 and medetomidine improved CAP recovery to 41% and 46% after 1 h of OGD. Curiously, alpha2 antagonists alone were also highly protective (e.g., atipamezole: 86% CAP recovery), at concentrations that did not affect baseline excitability. The protective effect of alpha2 receptor modulation was corroborated by imaging fluorescent Ca(2+) and Na(+) indicators within axons during OGD. Both agonists and antagonists significantly reduced axonal Ca(2+) and Na(+) accumulation in injured axons. These data suggest that the noradrenergic system plays an active role in the pathophysiology of axonal ischemia and that alpha2 receptor modulation may be useful against white matter injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.