Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19211798›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2009

Decreased EBNA-1-specific CD8+ T cells in patients with Epstein-Barr virus-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Mark H Fogg, Lori J Wirth, Marshall Posner, Fred Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark H FoggDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Lori J Wirth
Marshall Posner
Fred Wang
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

PATHOGENESIS OF EPSTEIN BARR VIRUS INFECTIONR01CA068051 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WANG, FREDERICK C. · 1995 to 2014
$5.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA68051NCI NIH HHS R01 CA068051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) nuclear antigen-1 (EBNA-1) is potentially a universal target for immune recognition of EBV-infected normal or malignant cells. EBNA-1-specific CD8+ T-cell responses have been assessed against a few epitopes presented on a limited number of HLA class I alleles. We now assess CD8+ T-cell responses to a complete panel of EBNA-1 peptides in an HLA-characterized population. We detected EBNA-1-specific CD8+ T cells in 10 of 14 healthy donors by analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and EBV-specific T-cell lines. The frequent detection of CD8+ T-cell responses was confirmed by mapping EBNA-1 epitopes and demonstrating HLA class I presentation to CD8+ T cells in 6 of 6 donors, including 2 new EBNA-1 epitopes presented by HLA A0206 and A6802. Importantly, EBNA-1-specific CD8+ T cells were significantly less frequent in EBV-specific T-cell lines from patients with EBV-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (3 out of 22, P = 0.0003), whereas the frequency of LMP2-specific responses (14 out of 22) was not significantly different from healthy donors (11 out of 14). EBNA-1-specific CD8+ T-cell responses were rescued in approximately half of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients by peptide and cytokine stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells, suggesting these EBNA-1-specific CD8+ T cells were functionally defective in their response to EBV-infected cells. These results indicate that humans normally mount a significant EBNA-1-specific CD8+ T-cell response to EBV infection, but the immune response to this tumor antigen has been significantly altered in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Overcoming this defect in EBV-specific immunity may prevent or enhance treatment of EBV-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesEpitopesEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsEpstein-Barr Virus Nuclear AntigensHealthHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsSubstrate SpecificityViral Matrix ProteinsEBV-associated membrane antigen, Epstein-Barr virusEBV-encoded nuclear antigen 1EpitopesEpstein-Barr Virus Nuclear AntigensViral Matrix Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19211798
PMCPMC2651339
OpenAlexW2014211213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.