ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2009
Therapeutic hypothermia for cardiac arrest: a practical approach.
Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Therapeutic hypothermia (TH), which prevents and ameliorates the cascade of secondary neurologic injury after the return of spontaneous circulation, is the most effective neuroprotective therapy for encephalopathic survivors of cardiac arrest. Despite the compelling efficacy of TH, most patients who survive cardiac arrest long enough to be hospitalized will nonetheless suffer a poor neurologic outcome. Attention to the details of therapy and an integrated approach involving emergency medicine, neurology, cardiology, critical care medicine, and palliative care are likely to yield the best results. This effort is complex, and broad implementation of TH has been slow in the United States and Europe. Given that most cardiac arrest mortality in patients who survive long enough to be hospitalized is due to brain injury rather than circulatory collapse, neurologists should recognize their primary role as advocates for neuroprotective therapy at all stages of the evaluation. In the emergency department, hemodynamic stabilization must be achieved and a rapid neurologic and cardiac evaluation performed, with patients efficiently triaged to hypothermia and cardiac revascularization. Cardiologists should be aware that it is safe and desirable to induce TH, even when urgent coronary angiography and percutaneous revascularization procedures are required. In the intensive care unit, cerebral perfusion must be optimized, metabolic homeostasis achieved, and neuromonitoring used during the dangerous decooling phase. Cardiac arrest is always a life-altering event for patients and their families. Even after cardiac arrest survivors have been stabilized and treated, physicians must recogonize and embrace their role in facilitating a variety of difficult transitions: to organ donation, end-of-life care, nursing or rehabilitation placement, or home.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.