ArticleBMC bioinformatics2009
TACOA: taxonomic classification of environmental genomic fragments using a kernelized nearest neighbor approach.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed.
- The application of machine learning in clinical microbiology and infectious diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- A survey of k-mer methods and applications in bioinformatics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Machine learning for microbiologists.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024Review
- The endophytome (plant-associated microbiome): methodological approaches, biological aspects, and biotech applications.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2021Review
- Metagenomic approaches in microbial ecology: an update on whole-genome and marker gene sequencing analyses.Microbial genomics · 2020Review
- An Integrated Multi-Disciplinary Perspectivefor Addressing Challenges of the Human Gut Microbiome.Metabolites · 2020Review
- Elucidation of Codon Usage Signatures across the Domains of Life.Molecular biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Taxonomy based performance metrics for evaluating taxonomic assignment methods.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- K-mer-Based Motif Analysis in Insect Species acrossComputational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2019Article
- Machine Learning Approaches for Epidemiological Investigations of Food-Borne Disease Outbreaks.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Review
- Considerations for Optimization of High-Throughput Sequencing Bioinformatics Pipelines for Virus Detection.Viruses · 2018Article
- CoreProbe: A Novel Algorithm for Estimating Relative Abundance Based on Metagenomic Reads.Genes · 2018Article
- Comparing fixed sampling with minimizer sampling when using k-mer indexes to find maximal exact matches.PloS one · 2018Article
- CoMet: a workflow using contig coverage and composition for binning a metagenomic sample with high precision.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- A clinician's guide to microbiome analysis.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2017Review
- EnSVMB: Metagenomics Fragments Classification using Ensemble SVM and BLAST.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- PaPrBaG: A machine learning approach for the detection of novel pathogens from NGS data.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Current Knowledge and Computational Techniques for Grapevine Meta-Omics Analysis.Frontiers in plant science · 2017Review
- Loeffler 4.0: Diagnostic Metagenomics.Advances in virus research · 2017Review
- Article
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetagenomics, or the sequencing and analysis of collective genomes (metagenomes) of microorganisms isolated from an environment, promises direct access to the "unculturable majority". This emerging field offers the potential to lay solid basis on our understanding of the entire living world. However, the taxonomic classification is an essential task in the analysis of metagenomics data sets that it is still far from being solved. We present a novel strategy to predict the taxonomic origin of environmental genomic fragments. The proposed classifier combines the idea of the k-nearest neighbor with strategies from kernel-based learning.
resultsOur novel strategy was extensively evaluated using the leave-one-out cross validation strategy on fragments of variable length (800 bp - 50 Kbp) from 373 completely sequenced genomes. TACOA is able to classify genomic fragments of length 800 bp and 1 Kbp with high accuracy until rank class. For longer fragments > or = 3 Kbp accurate predictions are made at even deeper taxonomic ranks (order and genus). Remarkably, TACOA also produces reliable results when the taxonomic origin of a fragment is not represented in the reference set, thus classifying such fragments to its known broader taxonomic class or simply as "unknown". We compared the classification accuracy of TACOA with the latest intrinsic classifier PhyloPythia using 63 recently published complete genomes. For fragments of length 800 bp and 1 Kbp the overall accuracy of TACOA is higher than that obtained by PhyloPythia at all taxonomic ranks. For all fragment lengths, both methods achieved comparable high specificity results up to rank class and low false negative rates are also obtained.
conclusionAn accurate multi-class taxonomic classifier was developed for environmental genomic fragments. TACOA can predict with high reliability the taxonomic origin of genomic fragments as short as 800 bp. The proposed method is transparent, fast, accurate and the reference set can be easily updated as newly sequenced genomes become available. Moreover, the method demonstrated to be competitive when compared to the most current classifier PhyloPythia and has the advantage that it can be locally installed and the reference set can be kept up-to-date.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.