ArticleHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2009
Predictors of decision making in families at risk for inherited breast/ovarian cancer.
Article in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Randomized trial of print messaging: the role of the partner and monitoring style in promoting provider discussions about prostate cancer screening among African American men.Psycho-oncology · 2014Trial
- Genetic Testing and Post-Testing Decision Making among BRCA-Positive Mutation Women: A Psychosocial Approach.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- Development of the Informing Relatives Inventory (IRI): Assessing Index Patients' Knowledge, Motivation and Self-Efficacy Regarding the Disclosure of Hereditary Cancer Risk Information to Relatives.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2015Article
- Monitoring style of coping with cancer related threats: a review of the literature.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2014Review
- Distress and the parenting dynamic among BRCA1/2 tested mothers and their partners.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2014Article
- Issues of ovarian cancer survivors in the USA: a literature review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013Review
- Application of dyadic data analysis in pediatric psychology: cystic fibrosis health-related quality of life and anxiety in child-caregiver dyads.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2012Article
- Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing.Journal of genetic counseling · 2012Article
- The impact of physicians' reactions to uncertainty on patients' decision satisfaction.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2011Article
- Preserving the self: the process of decision making about hereditary breast cancer and ovarian cancer risk reduction.Qualitative health research · 2011Article
- A whisper-game perspective on the family communication of DNA-test results: a retrospective study on the communication process of BRCA1/2-test results between proband and relatives.Familial cancer · 2011Article
- Exploring attitudes, beliefs, and communication preferences of Latino community members regarding BRCA1/2 mutation testing and preventive strategies.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2010Article
- Dispositional cancer worry: convergent, divergent, and predictive validity of existing scales.Journal of psychosocial oncology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with decision making about inherited cancer risk information within families and determine the interdependence between survivors' and relatives' decision making.
designA descriptive, cross-sectional design using a population-based sample of 146 dyads (N = 292) was used. Analyses included multilevel modeling using the Actor-Partner-Interdependence Model.
main outcome measuresDecision making regarding inherited cancer risk information.
resultsSeveral individual and family factors contributed toward survivors' and female relatives' decision making about inherited cancer risk information. Individual factors included the individual's perceptions of their family communication and cancer history. Family factors included survivors' and family members' age, communication and coping style that influenced the decision making of the other member of the dyad. Cancer worries and a monitoring coping style affected both seeking and avoiding decision making for survivors and relatives.
conclusionsIn view of the importance of genetic information upon family health outcomes, it is critical to address both individual and family factors that may influence decision making about cancer risk information and surveillance options for all members within the family.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.