ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2009
FastChi: an efficient algorithm for analyzing gene-gene interactions.
Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ultrafast genome-wide scan for SNP-SNP interactions in common complex disease.Genome research · 2012Pooled it
- Article
- Stepwise Distributed Open Innovation Contests for Software Development: Acceleration of Genome-Wide Association Analysis.GigaScience · 2017Article
- Chi8: a GPU program for detecting significant interacting SNPs with the Chi-square 8-df test.BMC research notes · 2015Article
- Hunting complex differential gene interaction patterns across molecular contexts.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Testing gene-gene interactions in genome wide association studies.Genetic epidemiology · 2014Article
- GWIS--model-free, fast and exhaustive search for epistatic interactions in case-control GWAS.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- eQTL Epistasis - Challenges and Computational Approaches.Frontiers in genetics · 2013Article
- Chapter 10: Mining genome-wide genetic markers.PLoS computational biology · 2012Article
- Performance analysis of novel methods for detecting epistasis.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- TEAM: efficient two-locus epistasis tests in human genome-wide association study.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010Article
- FastEpistasis: a high performance computing solution for quantitative trait epistasis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in high-throughput genotyping have inspired increasing research interests in genome-wide association study for diseases. To understand underlying biological mechanisms of many diseases, we need to consider simultaneously the genetic effects across multiple loci. The large number of SNPs often makes multilocus association study very computationally challenging because it needs to explicitly enumerate all possible SNP combinations at the genome-wide scale. Moreover, with the large number of SNPs correlated, permutation procedure is often needed for properly controlling family-wise error rates. This makes the problem even more computationally demanding, since the test procedure needs to be repeated for each permuted data. In this paper, we present FastChi, an exhaustive yet efficient algorithm for genome-wide two-locus chi-square test. FastChi utilizes an upper bound of the two-locus chi-square test, which can be expressed as the sum of two terms--both are efficient to compute: the first term is based on the single-locus chi-square test for the given phenotype; and the second term only depends on the genotypes and is independent of the phenotype. This upper bound enables the algorithm to only perform the two-locus chi-square test on a small number of candidate SNP pairs without the risk of missing any significant ones. Since the second part of the upper bound only needs to be precomputed once and stored for subsequence uses, the advantage is more prominent in large permutation tests. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that our method is an order of magnitude faster than the brute force alternative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19209728PMC2728448What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.