Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19208466›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2009

Poly(dA:dT) tracts: major determinants of nucleosome organization.

Eran Segal, Jonathan Widom

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 257 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
257citing papers in PubMed
17.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

257 citing papers in PubMed, 439 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Emergence Biases in Molecular Evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Tuning fungal promoters for the expression of eukaryotic proteins.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  18. PeculiarGenes · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Nucleosomal DNA has topological memory.Nature communications · 2024
    Article

197 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eran SegalDepartment of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76100, Israel. eran.segal@weizmann.ac.il
Jonathan Widom
Northwestern University · USWeizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

NUCLEOSOME POSITIONINGR01GM058617 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI UHLENBECK, OLKE C · 1999 to 2012
$4.4M
MECHANISTIC PROBLEMS IN EUKARYOTIC GENE REGULATIONR01GM054692 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI UHLENBECK, OLKE C · 1997 to 2011
$3.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054692NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homopolymeric stretches of deoxyadenosine nucleotides (A's) on one strand of double-stranded DNA, referred to as poly(dA:dT) tracts or A-tracts, are overabundant in eukaryotic genomes. They have unusual structural, dynamic, and mechanical properties, and may resist sharp bending. Such unusual material properties, together with their overabundance in eukaryotes, raised the possibility that poly(dA:dT) tracts might function in eukaryotes to influence the organization of nucleosomes at many genomic regions. Recent genome-wide studies strongly confirm these ideas and suggest that these tracts play major roles in chromatin organization and genome function. Here we review what is known about poly(dA:dT) tracts and how they work.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceDNAHumansModels, BiologicalMolecular Sequence DataNucleic Acid ConformationNucleosomesPoly dA-dTDNANucleosomesPoly dA-dT

Identifiers

PMID19208466
PMCPMC2673466
OpenAlexW1996065618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.