Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19208261›Full record

Trial reportBMC neurology2009

Improving community ambulation after stroke: the AMBULATE Trial.

Louise Ada, Catherine M Dean, Richard Lindley, Gemma Lloyd

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC neurology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03254797 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Stepping Training With External Feedback on Walking and Functional Ability in Ambulatory Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorKhon Kaen UniversityRan2017 to 2020Enrolled44ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuriesArmsStepping training with feedback, Stepping training without feedback
NCT03875066 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Immediate Effects of Stepping Training With or Without External Feedback on Walking and Functional Ability in Ambulatory Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorKhon Kaen UniversityRan2017 to 2019Enrolled30ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuriesArmsStepping training without feedback, Stepping training with feedback
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Caregiver-mediated exercises for improving outcomes after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Interventions for improving community ambulation in individuals with stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Louise AdaDiscipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. l.ada@usyd.edu.au
Catherine M Dean
Richard Lindley
Gemma Lloyd
The University of Sydney · AUWestmead Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt has been reported that following rehabilitation, only 7% of stroke survivors are able to walk at a level commensurate with community participation. Previous research indicates that treadmill and overground walking training can improve walking capacity in people living in the community after stroke. The main objectives of the AMBULATE trial are to determine (i) whether a 4-month treadmill walking program is more effective than a 2-month program, compared to control, in improving walking capacity, health and community participation and (ii) the "threshold" walking speed that results in sufficient walking capacity that makes walking self-sustaining. METHODS/

designA prospective randomised controlled trial of unsupported treadmill training with a 12 month follow-up with concealed allocation and blinded assessment will be conducted. 210 community-dwelling people after stroke who are able to walk independently but slowly will be recruited and randomly allocated to either a 4 month training group, 2 month training group or the control (no intervention) group. Intervention for the two training groups will occur 3 days per week for 30 minutes each session. Measurements of walking, health and community participation will be taken at baseline, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months and 12 months. This study has obtained ethical approval from the relevant Human Research Ethics Committees. DISCUSSION: By improving stroke survivors' walking ability, it is likely also to improve their general wellbeing by promoting better health and greater community participation. Furthermore, if stroke survivors can reach a point where their walking and community participation is self-sustaining, this will reduce the burden of care on family and friends as well as the economic burden on the health system. Given the major demographic shift in developed nations involving significant growth in the aged population, this research will make an important evidence-based contribution to the promotion of healthy ageing.

trial registrationThis trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, (ACTRN012607000227493).

Indexed as

Stroke RehabilitationDouble-Blind MethodExercise TherapyHumansProspective StudiesResidence CharacteristicsSample SizeSocial BehaviorWalking

Identifiers

PMID19208261
PMCPMC2650676
OpenAlexW2036875045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.