Trial reportBMC neurology2009
Changes in cognitive domains during three years in patients with Alzheimer's disease treated with donepezil.
Trial report in BMC neurology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional connectivity and cognitive changes after donepezil treatment in healthy participants.Psychopharmacology · 2021Trial
- New scoring methodology improves the sensitivity of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) in clinical trials.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2015Trial
- The clinical promise of biomarkers of synapse damage or loss in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2020Review
- Describing the Sequence of Cognitive Decline in Alzheimer's Disease Patients: Results from an Observational Study.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2016Observational
- Dose-dependent effects of ladostigil on microglial activation and cognition in aged rats.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2013Article
- Neuropsychological test performance and cognitive reserve in healthy aging and the Alzheimer's disease spectrum: a theoretically driven factor analysis.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2012Article
- Anti-inflammatory effects of ladostigil and its metabolites in aged rat brain and in microglial cells.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2012Article
- Neuroprotective herbs and foods from different traditional medicines and diets.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2010Review
- Subregional neuroanatomical change as a biomarker for Alzheimer's disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of MLC601 in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extraArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe objective was to identify separate cognitive domains in the standard assessment tools (MMSE, ADAS-Cog) and analyze the process of decline within domains during three years in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients with donepezil treatment.
methodAD patients (n = 421) were recruited from a clinical multi-centre study program in Sweden. Patients were assessed every six months during three years. All patients received donepezil starting directly after study entry. After dropouts, 158 patients remained for analyses over three years. Data for the other patients were analysed until they dropped out (4 groups based on length in study).
resultsFactor analyses of all items suggested that there were three intercorrelated factors: a General, a Memory and a Spatial factor for which we constructed corresponding domains. Overall there was a cognitive improvement at six months followed by a linear drop over time for the three domains. Some group and domain differences were identified. Patients who remained longer in the study had better initial performance and a slower deterioration rate. The early dropouts showed no improvement at six months and many dropped out due to side effects. The other groups displayed a performance improvement at six months that was less pronounced in the Memory domain. Before dropping out, deterioration accelerated, particularly in the Spatial domain.
conclusionThe course of illness in the three domains was heterogeneous among the patients. We were not able to identify any clinically relevant correlates of this heterogeneity. As an aid we constructed three algorithms corresponding to the cognitive domains, which can be used to characterize patients initially, identify rapid decliners and follow the course of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.