Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19208196›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2009

PhenoGO: an integrated resource for the multiscale mining of clinical and biological data.

Lee T Sam, Eneida A Mendonça, Jianrong Li, Judith Blake, Carol Friedman, Yves A Lussier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Event-based text mining for biology and functional genomics.Briefings in functional genomics · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Computational approaches for translational clinical research in disease progression.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2011
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lee T SamCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. lsam@umich.edu
Eneida A Mendonça
Jianrong Li
Judith Blake
Carol Friedman
Yves A Lussier

Funding

Nation Center: Multi-Scale Study- Cellular Networks(RMI)U54CA121852 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CALIFANO, ANDREA · 2005 to 2015
$37.4M
Capturing and linking genomic and clinical informationR01LM007659 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FRIEDMAN, CAROL · 2003 to 2006
$1.9M
Semantic Approaches to Phenotypic Databases AnalysesK22LM008308 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LUSSIER, YVES A · 2004 to 2006
$468k
NCI NIH HHS 1U54CA121852NCI NIH HHS U54 CA121852NLM NIH HHS 1K22 LM008308-01NLM NIH HHS K22 LM008308NLM NIH HHS R01 LM007659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolving complexity of genome-scale experiments has increasingly centralized the role of a highly computable, accurate, and comprehensive resource spanning multiple biological scales and viewpoints. To provide a resource to meet this need, we have significantly extended the PhenoGO database with gene-disease specific annotations and included an additional ten species. This a computationally-derived resource is primarily intended to provide phenotypic context (cell type, tissue, organ, and disease) for mining existing associations between gene products and GO terms specified in the Gene Ontology Databases Automated natural language processing (BioMedLEE) and computational ontology (PhenOS) methods were used to derive these relationships from the literature, expanding the database with information from ten additional species to include over 600,000 phenotypic contexts spanning eleven species from five GO annotation databases. A comprehensive evaluation evaluating the mappings (n = 300) found precision (positive predictive value) at 85%, and recall (sensitivity) at 76%. Phenotypes are encoded in general purpose ontologies such as Cell Ontology, the Unified Medical Language System, and in specialized ontologies such as the Mouse Anatomy and the Mammalian Phenotype Ontology. A web portal has also been developed, allowing for advanced filtering and querying of the database as well as download of the entire dataset http://www.phenogo.org.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticPhenotypeSoftwareAnimalsComputational BiologyHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMiceNatural Language ProcessingUnified Medical Language System

Identifiers

PMID19208196
PMCPMC2646241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.