Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19208186›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2009

Robust methods for accurate diagnosis using pan-microbiological oligonucleotide microarrays.

Yang Liu, Lee Sam, Jianrong Li, Yves A Lussier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yang LiuCenter for Biomedical Informatics and Section of Genetic Medicine, Dept, of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Ave, Ill, USA. yuwang_la@yahoo.com
Lee Sam
Jianrong Li
Yves A Lussier
University of Chicago · USCancer Research Center · US

Funding

Viral Pathogenesis and TherapeuticsU54AI057158 · NIAID · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI LEVY, DAVID E · 2003 to 2014
$100.8M
Semantic Approaches to Phenotypic Databases AnalysesK22LM008308 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LUSSIER, YVES A · 2004 to 2006
$468k
NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057158NIAID NIH HHS U54AI57158NLM NIH HHS K22 LM008308NLM NIH HHS LM008308-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo address the limitations of traditional virus and pathogen detection methodologies in clinical diagnosis, scientists have developed high-throughput oligonucleotide microarrays to rapidly identify infectious agents. However, objectively identifying pathogens from the complex hybridization patterns of these massively multiplexed arrays remains challenging.

methodsIn this study, we conceived an automated method based on the hypergeometric distribution for identifying pathogens in multiplexed arrays and compared it to five other methods. We evaluated these metrics: 1) accurate prediction, whether the top ranked prediction(s) match the real virus(es); 2) four accuracy scores.

resultsThough accurate prediction and high specificity and sensitivity can be achieved with several methods, the method based on hypergeometric distribution provides a significant advantage in term of positive predicting value with two to sixty folds the positive predicting values of other methods.

conclusionThe proposed multi-specie array analysis based on the hypergeometric distribution addresses shortcomings of previous methods by enhancing signals of positively hybridized probes.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsComputational BiologyInfectionsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisParasitic DiseasesSensitivity and SpecificityVirus Diseases

Identifiers

PMID19208186
PMCPMC2646242
OpenAlexW2060667827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.