Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19206998›Full record

ArticleDNA and cell biology2009

Resident microbiota of the gypsy moth midgut harbors antibiotic resistance determinants.

Heather K Allen, Karen A Cloud-Hansen, Joseph M Wolinski, Changhui Guan, Serena Greene, Shyue Lu, Mallory Boeyink, Nichole A Broderick, Kenneth F Raffa, Jo Handelsman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in DNA and cell biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Antibiotic resistance: Time of synthesis in a post-genomic age.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. New Insights into the Microbiota of Moth Pests.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heather K AllenDepartments of Bacteriology and Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Karen A Cloud-Hansen
Joseph M Wolinski
Changhui Guan
Serena Greene
Shyue Lu
Mallory Boeyink
Nichole A Broderick
Kenneth F Raffa
Jo Handelsman
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the significance of insects as environmental reservoirs of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. We characterized the antibiotic resistome of the microbial community in gypsy moth larval midguts by applying functional metagenomics to cultured isolates. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of 12 antibiotics were determined for 44 cultured isolates, and antibiotic resistance genes were selected from metagenomic libraries derived from DNA extracted from a pool of the isolates. Six unique clones were identified. Two were highly resistant to penicillin-type beta-lactams, two were moderately resistant to erythromycin, and two were moderately resistant to a range of antibiotics, including erythromycin, carbenicillin, and chloramphenicol. Sequence analysis predicted that the active genes encoded efflux pumps, a transcriptional activator of efflux pump protein expression, and an extended-spectrum class A beta-lactamase. Insect guts are a reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes with the potential for dissemination.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaDrug Resistance, BacterialGastrointestinal TractGene LibraryGenes, BacterialLarvaMetagenomeMetagenomicsMothsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID19206998
OpenAlexW1997483088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.