Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19206080›Full record

ArticleHealth economics2010

Uncertainty and validation of health economic decision models.

Lois G Kim, Simon G Thompson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
17.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An Evaluation of Survival Curve Extrapolation Techniques Using Long-Term Observational Cancer Data.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2019
    Article
  13. Discrete Event Simulation for Decision Modeling in Health Care: Lessons from Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Extrapolating Survival from Randomized Trials Using External Data: A Review of Methods.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2017
    Review
  16. 2. How is the economic assessment of vaccines performed today?Journal of market access & health policy · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Calibration of complex models through Bayesian evidence synthesis: a demonstration and tutorial.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lois G KimMedical Statistics Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT. lois.kim@lshtm.ac.uk
Simon G Thompson
MRC Biostatistics Unit · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/08/014/24067Medical Research Council G9533930Medical Research Council U.1052.00.001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health economic decision models are based on specific assumptions relating to model structure and parameter estimation. Validation of these models is recommended as an indicator of reliability, but is not commonly reported. Furthermore, models derived from different data and employing different assumptions may produce a variety of results.A Markov model for evaluating the long-term cost-effectiveness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm is described. Internal, prospective and external validations are carried out using individual participant data from two randomised trials. Validation is assessed in terms of total numbers and timings of key events, and total costs and life-years. Since the initial model validates well only internally, two further models are developed that better fit the prospective and external validation data. All three models are then extrapolated to a life-time horizon, producing cost-effectiveness estimates ranging from pound1600 to pound4200 per life-year gained.Parameter uncertainty is now commonly addressed in health economic decision modelling. However, the derivation of models from different data sources adds another level of uncertainty. This extra uncertainty should be recognised in practical decision-making and, where possible, specifically investigated through independent model validation.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesModels, EconometricAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMarkov ChainsMass ScreeningReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID19206080
OpenAlexW2071087580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.