Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19204817›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary bioinformatics online2008

Intraspecific ITS variability in the kingdom fungi as expressed in the international sequence databases and its implications for molecular species identification.

R Henrik Nilsson, Erik Kristiansson, Martin Ryberg, Nils Hallenberg, Karl-Henrik Larsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary bioinformatics online, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 262 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
262citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

262 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Unveiling Metabolic Capability and Growth Adaptation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Morphological and Phylogenetic Analyses Reveal Four New Species ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The GenusJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  9. The genusIMA fungus · 2026
    Article
  10. PolyphasicFrontiers in nutrition · 2026
    Article
  11. Genomic analysis ofMycoscience · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Three new species ofMycoscience · 2025
    Article
  20. Morpho-phylogenic characterization ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article

202 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R Henrik NilssonDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden. henrik.nilsson@dpes.gu.se
Erik Kristiansson
Martin Ryberg
Nils Hallenberg
Karl-Henrik Larsson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the nuclear ribosomal repeat unit is the most popular locus for species identification and subgeneric phylogenetic inference in sequence-based mycological research. The region is known to show certain variability even within species, although its intraspecific variability is often held to be limited and clearly separated from interspecific variability. The existence of such a divide between intra- and interspecific variability is implicitly assumed by automated approaches to species identification, but whether intraspecific variability indeed is negligible within the fungal kingdom remains contentious. The present study estimates the intraspecific ITS variability in all fungi presently available to the mycological community through the international sequence databases. Substantial differences were found within the kingdom, and the results are not easily correlated to the taxonomic affiliation or nutritional mode of the taxa considered. No single unifying yet stringent upper limit for intraspecific variability, such as the canonical 3% threshold, appears to be applicable with the desired outcome throughout the fungi. Our results caution against simplified approaches to automated ITS-based species delimitation and reiterate the need for taxonomic expertise in the translation of sequence data into species names.

Indexed as

fungiintraspecific variationmolecular species delimitation

Identifiers

PMID19204817
PMCPMC2614188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.