Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19204294›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2009

Formation of new chromosomes as a virulence mechanism in yeast Candida glabrata.

Silvia Poláková, Christian Blume, Julián Alvarez Zárate, Marek Mentel, Dorte Jørck-Ramberg, Jørgen Stenderup, Jure Piskur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 128 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
128citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

128 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Dual adaptive strategies inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Silvia PolákováDepartment of Cell and Organism Biology, Lund University, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden.
Christian Blume
Julián Alvarez Zárate
Marek Mentel
Dorte Jørck-Ramberg
Jørgen Stenderup
Jure Piskur

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In eukaryotes, the number and rough organization of chromosomes is well preserved within isolates of the same species. Novel chromosomes and loss of chromosomes are infrequent and usually associated with pathological events. Here, we analyzed 40 pathogenic isolates of a haploid and asexual yeast, Candida glabrata, for their genome structure and stability. This organism has recently become the second most prevalent yeast pathogen in humans. Although the gene sequences were well conserved among different strains, their chromosome structures differed drastically. The most frequent events reshaping chromosomes were translocations of chromosomal arms. However, also larger segmental duplications were frequent and occasionally we observed novel chromosomes. Apparently, this yeast can generate a new chromosome by duplication of chromosome segments carrying a centromere and subsequently adding novel telomeric ends. We show that the observed genome plasticity is connected with antifungal drug resistance and it is likely an advantage in the human body, where environmental conditions fluctuate a lot.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, FungalAntifungal AgentsBase SequenceBlotting, SouthernCandida glabrataDNA PrimersElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionVirulenceAntifungal AgentsDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID19204294
PMCPMC2637908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.