Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19204205›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2009

Breast cancer subtypes and response to docetaxel in node-positive breast cancer: use of an immunohistochemical definition in the BCIRG 001 trial.

Judith Hugh, John Hanson, Maggie Chon U Cheang, Torsten O Nielsen, Charles M Perou, Charles Dumontet, John Reed, Maryla Krajewska, Isabelle Treilleux, Matthieu Rupin and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 201 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
201citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
23.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

201 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 534 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Taxanes for adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Assignment of tumor subtype by genomic testing and pathologic-based approximations: implications on patient's management and therapy selection.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2014
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. [Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

141 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Judith HughDepartment of Lab Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112th St, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2B7. judith.hugh@capitalhealth.ca
John Hanson
Maggie Chon U Cheang
Torsten O Nielsen
Charles M Perou
Charles Dumontet
John Reed
Maryla Krajewska
Isabelle Treilleux
Matthieu Rupin
Emmanuelle Magherini
John Mackey
Miguel Martin
Charles Vogel
BC Cancer Agency · CA

Funding

Tissue Procurement & PathologyP50CA058223 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KATHERINE A. HOADLEY · 1992 to 2026
$59.3M
Biological Breast Cancer Classification by qRT-PCRU01CA114722 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ELLIS, MATTHEW J · 2005 to 2009
$8.7M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058223NCI NIH HHS P50-CA58223NCI NIH HHS U01 CA114722NCI NIH HHS U01 CA114722-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the prognostic and predictive significance of subtyping node-positive early breast cancer by immunohistochemistry in a clinical trial of a docetaxel-containing regimen.

methodsPathologic data from a central laboratory were available for 1,350 patients (91%) from the BCIRG 001 trial of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) for operable node-positive breast cancer. Patients were classified by tumor characteristics as (1) triple negative (estrogen receptor [ER]-negative, progesterone receptor [PR]-negative, HER2/neu [HER2]-negative), (2) HER2 (HER2-positive, ER-negative, PR-negative), (3) luminal B (ER-positive and/or PR-positive and either HER2-positive and/or Ki67(high)), and (4) luminal A (ER-positive and/or PR-positive and not HER2-positive or Ki67(high)), and assessed for prognostic significance and response to adjuvant chemotherapy.

resultsPatients were subdivided into triple negative (14.5%), HER2 (8.5%), luminal B (61.1%), and luminal A (15.9%). Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates (P values with luminal B as referent) were 67% (P < .0001), 68% (P = .0008), 82% (referent luminal B), and 91% (P = .0027), respectively, with hazard ratios of 2.22, 2.12, and 0.46. Improved 3-year DFS with TAC was found in the luminal B group (P = .025) and a combined ER-positive/HER2-negative group treated with tamoxifen (P = .041), with a marginal trend in the triple negatives (P = .051) and HER2 (P = .068) subtypes. No DFS advantage was seen in the luminal A population.

conclusionA simple immunopanel can divide breast cancers into biologic subtypes with strong prognostic effects. TAC significantly complements endocrine therapy in patients with luminal B subtype and, in the absence of targeted therapy, is effective in the triple-negative population.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsDocetaxelErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedReceptors, EstrogenTamoxifenTaxoidsDocetaxelERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenTamoxifenTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID19204205
PMCPMC2667821
OpenAlexW2136655134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.