Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19203383›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2009

Dynamic evolution of V1R putative pheromone receptors between Mus musculus and Mus spretus.

Vanessa C Kurzweil, Mike Getman, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Eric D Green, Robert P Lane

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Coding of pheromones by vomeronasal receptors.Cell and tissue research · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Excreted Steroids in Vertebrate Social Communication.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vanessa C KurzweilDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06457, USA. vkurzweil@wesleyan.edu
Mike Getman
NISC Comparative Sequencing Program
Eric D Green
Robert P Lane
Wesleyan University · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Pheromone Receptor Genomic Evolution and Gene RegulationR01DC006267 · NIDCD · WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY · PI LANE, ROBERT P. · 2003 to 2014
$3.6M
Intramural NIH HHSNIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006267NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC006267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe mammalian vomeronasal organ (VNO) expresses two G-protein coupled receptor gene families that mediate pheromone responses, the V1R and V2R receptor genes. In rodents, there are ~150 V1R genes comprising 12 subfamilies organized in gene clusters at multiple chromosomal locations. Previously, we showed that several of these subfamilies had been extensively modulated by gene duplications, deletions, and gene conversions around the time of the evolutionary split of the mouse and rat lineages, consistent with the hypothesis that V1R repertoires might be involved in reinforcing speciation events. Here, we generated genome sequence for one large cluster containing two V1R subfamilies in Mus spretus, a closely related and sympatric species to Mus musculus, and investigated evolutionary change in these repertoires along the two mouse lineages.

resultsWe describe a comparison of spretus and musculus with respect to genome organization and synteny, as well as V1R gene content and phylogeny, with reference to previous observations made between mouse and rat. Unlike the mouse-rat comparisons, synteny seems to be largely conserved between the two mouse species. Disruption of local synteny is generally associated with differences in repeat content, although these differences appear to arise more from deletion than new integrations. Even though unambiguous V1R orthology is evident, we observe dynamic modulation of the functional repertoires, with two of seven V1Rb and one of eleven V1Ra genes lost in spretus, two V1Ra genes becoming pseudogenes in musculus, two additional orthologous pairs apparently subject to strong adaptive selection, and another divergent orthologous pair that apparently was subjected to gene conversion.

conclusionTherefore, eight of the 18 (~44%) presumptive V1Ra/V1Rb genes in the musculus-spretus ancestor appear to have undergone functional modulation since these two species diverged. As compared to the rat-mouse split, where modulation is evident by independent expansions of these two V1R subfamilies, divergence between musculus and spretus has arisen more by mutations within coding sequences. These results support the hypothesis that adaptive changes in functional V1R repertoires contribute to the delineation of very closely related species.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsChemotactic FactorsChromosome MappingChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialChromosomes, MammalianGenetic SpeciationGenomeLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsMiceMultigene FamilyReceptors, PheromoneSelection, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificitySyntenyChemotactic FactorsReceptors, PheromoneV1ra1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID19203383
PMCPMC2644715
OpenAlexW2112021096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.