Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19203112›Full record

Trial reportCurrent topics in microbiology and immunology2009

Measles virus for cancer therapy.

S J Russell, K W Peng

Abstract readClinical TrialReview
In one paragraph

Trial report in Current topics in microbiology and immunology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
32.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 173 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Oncolytic Virotherapy and Microenvironment in Multiple Myeloma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S J RussellMayo Clinic, Department of Molecular Medicine, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. sjr@mayo.edu
K W Peng
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

Radiovirotherapy for Multiple MyelomaR01CA100634 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI RUSSELL, STEPHEN J · 2003 to 2012
$3.2M
Antibody Neutralization of Therapeutic VirusesR01CA129966 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI RUSSELL, STEPHEN J · 2008 to 2012
$2.5M
Retargeted Oncolytic Measles Viruses Displaying Single-Chain AntibodiesR01CA118488 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PENG, KAH-WHYE · 2006 to 2010
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA100634NCI NIH HHS CA118488NCI NIH HHS CA129966NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100634NCI NIH HHS R01 CA118488NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measles virus offers an ideal platform from which to build a new generation of safe, effective oncolytic viruses. Occasional so-called spontaneous tumor regressions have occurred during natural measles infections, but common tumors do not express SLAM, the wild-type MV receptor, and are therefore not susceptible to the virus. Serendipitously, attenuated vaccine strains of measles virus have adapted to use CD46, a regulator of complement activation that is expressed in higher abundance on human tumor cells than on their nontransformed counterparts. For this reason, attenuated measles viruses are potent and selective oncolytic agents showing impressive antitumor activity in mouse xenograft models. The viruses can be engineered to enhance their tumor specificity, increase their antitumor potency, and facilitate noninvasive in vivo monitoring of their spread. A major impediment to the successful deployment of oncolytic measles viruses as anticancer agents is the high prevalence of preexisting anti-measles immunity, which impedes bloodstream delivery and curtails intratumoral virus spread. It is hoped that these problems can be addressed by delivering the virus inside measles-infected cell carriers and/or by concomitant administration of immunosuppressive drugs. From a safety perspective, population immunity provides an excellent defense against measles spread from patient to carers and, in 50 years of human experience, reversion of attenuated measles to a wild-type pathogenic phenotype has not been observed. Clinical trials testing oncolytic measles viruses as an experimental cancer therapy are currently underway.

Indexed as

Oncolytic VirotherapyAnimalsGenetic EngineeringGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHumansMeasles virusMembrane Cofactor ProteinMiceNeoplasmsOncolytic VirusesMembrane Cofactor Protein

Identifiers

PMID19203112
PMCPMC3926122
OpenAlexW103845142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.