Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19201801›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2009

Differences in hydrogenase gene expression between Methanosarcina acetivorans and Methanosarcina barkeri.

Adam M Guss, Gargi Kulkarni, William W Metcalf

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A promoter-RBS library for fine-tuning gene expression inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Coupling of biogas residue biochar and low-magnitude electric fields promotes anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Insights into the biotechnology potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  11. Correlation of Key Physiological Properties ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Formate-Dependent Heterodisulfide Reduction in aApplied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Responses ofBiotechnology for biofuels · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Physiology, Biochemistry, and Applications of F420- and Fo-Dependent Redox Reactions.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adam M GussDepartment of Microbiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 601 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Gargi Kulkarni
William W Metcalf

Funding

Cellular and Molecular Biology Training GrantT32GM007283 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI MORRISSEY, JAMES H. · 1985 to 2011
$4.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007283PHS HHS T32GMO7283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methanosarcina acetivorans C2A encodes three putative hydrogenases, including one cofactor F(420)-linked (frh) and two methanophenazine-linked (vht) enzymes. Comparison of the amino acid sequences of these putative hydrogenases to those of Methanosarcina barkeri and Methanosarcina mazei shows that each predicted subunit contains all the known residues essential for hydrogenase function. The DNA sequences upstream of the genes in M. acetivorans were aligned with those in other Methanosarcina species to identify conserved transcription and translation signals. The M. acetivorans vht promoter region is well conserved among the sequenced Methanosarcina species, while the second vht-type homolog (here called vhx) and frh promoters have only limited similarity. To experimentally determine whether these promoters are functional in vivo, we constructed and characterized both M. acetivorans and M. barkeri strains carrying reporter gene fusions to each of the M. acetivorans and M. barkeri hydrogenase promoters. Generally, the M. acetivorans gene fusions are not expressed in either organism, suggesting that cis-acting mutations inactivated the M. acetivorans promoters. The M. barkeri hydrogenase gene fusions, on the other hand, are expressed in both organisms, indicating that M. acetivorans possesses the machinery to express hydrogenases, although it does not express its own hydrogenases. These data are consistent with specific inactivation of the M. acetivorans hydrogenase promoters and highlight the importance of testing hypotheses generated by using genomic data.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingPromoter Regions, GeneticArtificial Gene Fusionbeta-GlucosidaseConserved SequenceGene OrderGenes, BacterialGenes, ReporterHydrogenaseMethanosarcinaMethanosarcina barkeriPhylogenySequence Alignmentbeta-GlucosidaseHydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID19201801
PMCPMC2668380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.