Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19201074›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2009

The clinical encounter as local moral world: shifts of assumptions and transformation in relational context.

Arlene M Katz, Margarita Alegría

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Narrative medicine in ethics education: from theory to practice.Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Trauma Recovery Rubric: A Mixed-Method Analysis of Trauma Recovery Pathways in Four Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The role of sociocultural information in mental health intake sessions.The Israel journal of psychiatry and related sciences · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. One size does not fit all: taking diversity, culture and context seriously.Administration and policy in mental health · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arlene M KatzDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA 02114, USA. arlene_katz@hms.harvard.edu
Margarita Alegría

Funding

UPR-CHA Research Center of Excellence: Making a Difference for Latino HealthP60MD002261 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO MED SCIENCES · PI MCGUIRE, THOMAS G. · 2007 to 2011
$8.7M
Project 1: Improving Clinical Assessment of Diagnosis for Latinos (261-295)P50MH073469 · NIMH · CAMBRIDGE HEALTH ALLIANCE · PI ALEGRIA, MARGARITA · 2005 to 2009
$4.6M
NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD0 02261NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD002261NIMH NIH HHS 1P50 MH0 73469NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH073469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study we consider the process of the clinical encounter, and present exemplars of how assumptions of both clinicians and their patients can shift or transform in the course of a diagnostic interview. We examine the process as it is recalled, and further elaborated, in post-diagnostic interviews as part of a collaborative inquiry during reflections with clinicians and patients in the northeastern United States. Rather than treating assumptions by patients and providers as a fixed attribute of an individual, we treat them as occurring between people within a particular social context, the diagnostic interview. We explore the diagnostic interview as a landscape in which assumptions occur (and can shift), navigate the features of this landscape, and suggest that our examination can best be achieved by the systematic comparison of views of the multiple actors in an experience-near manner. We describe what might be gained by this shift in assumptions and how it can make visible what is at stake for clinician and patient in their local moral worlds-for patients, acknowledgment of social suffering, for clinicians how assumptions are a barrier to engagement with minority patients. It is crucial for clinicians to develop this capacity for reflection when navigating the interactions with patients from different cultures, to recognize and transform assumptions, to notice 'surprises', and to elicit what really matters to patients in their care.

Indexed as

Cultural CompetencyPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultHealth Services ResearchHumansPrejudice

Identifiers

PMID19201074
PMCPMC3685141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.