ArticleThe Journal of hospital infection2009
Multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus discriminates within USA pulsed-field gel electrophoresis types.
Article in The Journal of hospital infection, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occurrence, distribution and pattern analysis of methicillin resistant (MRSA) and methicillin sensitive (MSSA) Staphylococcus aureus on fomites in public facilities.Pathogens and global health · 2021Article
- Bacterial Strain Diversity Within Wounds.Advances in wound care · 2015Review
- An improved MLVF method and its comparison with traditional MLVF, spa typing, MLST/SCCmec and PFGE for the typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2014Article
- Comparison of modified multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat fingerprinting with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2012Article
- Coagulase-negative staphylococci: update on the molecular epidemiology and clinical presentation, with a focus on Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus saprophyticus.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012Review
- Comparison of two multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat methods and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for differentiating highly clonal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2010Article
- Evaluation of multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis for typing a polyclonal hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus population in an area where such infections are endemic.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2010Article
- Multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis and plasmid profiling to study the occurrence of blaCMY-2 within a pulsed-field gel electrophoresis-defined clade of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many isolates of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are indistinguishable when compared using the standard pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) typing method. This may present a problem when investigating local outbreaks of MRSA transmission in a healthcare setting. It also impedes investigation of the widely disseminated community-acquired MRSA (USA 300-0114) in the inpatient setting, which is displacing other traditional hospital-acquired PFGE types. Combination of methods, including multiple-locus sequence typing (MLST), spa typing and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing, have been used with, or in place of, PFGE to characterise MRSA for epidemiological purposes. These methods are technically challenging, time-consuming and expensive and are rarely feasible except in large laboratories in tertiary care medical centres. Another method, which is simpler and with faster turnaround time, is multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA). We investigated the utility of MLVA to distinguish common PFGE types. The results suggest that MLVA can be used to identify unrelated strains with identical PFGE patterns or confirm close genetic composition of linked isolates. MLVA could potentially be used in conjunction with PFGE to validate relationships, but further prospective evaluation of these relationships will be required in order to define the proper role, if any, for use of this method in hospital epidemiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.