Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19200401›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2009

Validation of the Finnish version of the SCOFF questionnaire among young adults aged 20 to 35 years.

Sini Lähteenmäki, Terhi Aalto-Setälä, Jaana T Suokas, Suoma E Saarni, Jonna Perälä, Samuli I Saarni, Hillevi Aro, Jouko Lönnqvist, Jaana M Suvisaari

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Binge Eating Disorder in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Diagnostic and Management Challenges.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. SCOFF in a general swedish adolescent population.Journal of eating disorders · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sini LähteenmäkiDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland. sini.lahteenmaki@helsinki.fi
Terhi Aalto-Setälä
Jaana T Suokas
Suoma E Saarni
Jonna Perälä
Samuli I Saarni
Hillevi Aro
Jouko Lönnqvist
Jaana M Suvisaari
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FINational Institutes of Health · USHelsinki University Hospital · FITampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe tested the validity of the SCOFF, a five-question screening instrument for eating disorders, in a general population sample.

methodsA random sample of 1863 Finnish young adults was approached with a questionnaire that contained several screens for mental health interview, including the SCOFF. The questionnaire was returned by 1316 persons. All screen positives and a random sample of screen negatives were invited to SCID interview. Altogether 541 subjects participated in the SCID interview and had filled in the SCOFF questionnaire. We investigated the validity of the SCOFF in detecting current eating disorders by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) for different cut-off scores. We also performed a ROC analysis based on these 541 persons, of whom nine had current eating disorder.

resultsThe threshold of two positive answers presented the best ability to detect eating disorders, with a sensitivity of 77.8%, a specificity of 87.6%, a PPV of 9.7%, and a NPV of 99.6%. None of the subjects with current eating disorder scored zero points in the SCOFF.

conclusionDue to its low PPV, there are limitations in using the SCOFF as a screening instrument in unselected population samples. However, it might be used for ruling out the possibility of eating disorders.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAdultFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleFinlandHumansMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSensitivity and SpecificityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID19200401
PMCPMC2656502
OpenAlexW1963842293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.