Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19200256›Full record

ReviewCancer science2009

Clinical significance of tumor markers and an emerging perspective on colorectal cancer.

Keishi Yamashita, Masahiko Watanabe

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer science, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Beyond the biopsy: the new era of non-invasive staging and biomarkers in colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of colorectal cancer through the integration of serum tumor markers and hematological indicators with machine learning algorithms.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Tumor biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and targeted therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keishi YamashitaDepartment of Surgery, Kitasato University Hospital, Kitasato 1-15-1, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masahiko Watanabe
Kitasato University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA19-9, a carbohydrate antigen recognized by the monoclonal antibody NS19-9, are commonly used as classical tumor markers in colorectal cancer (CRC) clinics. The roles of tumor markers include: (1) diagnostic screening (diagnostic markers); (2) prediction of prognosis after treatment (prognostic markers); and (3) judgment tools for treatment effect (surveillance markers). Tumor markers can be evaluated in serum, stools, or even in tissues depending on the clinical purpose. The American Society for Clinical Oncology recommends that CEA is the only marker of choice for monitoring the response of metastatic disease to systemic therapy at present. In the present paper, we are the first to review the clinical significance of the classical tumor markers CEA and CA19-9 in serum, allowing for our original data, and present our view on the newly emerging biomarkers in CRC. Novel promising biomarkers for diagnostic, prognostic, and surveillance purposes are reviewed and considered, some of which are anticipated for further validation. For diagnostic markers, urine or serum might replace fecal samples in the near future. On the other hand, prognostic or predictive markers for treatment sensitivity may be identified from the molecular profiles of primary cancer tissues. Selection of patients who are sensitive to chemotherapy will reduce the number of patients who undergo harmful chemotherapy with no effectiveness. The optimal tumor markers would be generalized, easy to assess, and accurate, and such markers are eagerly anticipated to enable personalized tailored therapy for CRC patients.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenColorectal NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic Antigen

Identifiers

PMID19200256
PMCPMC11158403
OpenAlexW2081052881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.