ArticleNano letters2009
Computational validation of protein nanotubes.
Article in Nano letters, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Symmetry-based self-assembled nanotubes constructed using native protein structures: the key role of flexible linkers.Protein and peptide letters · 2011Article
- Multiscale computer simulation of the immature HIV-1 virion.Biophysical journal · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present a novel generic computational method to assess protein nanotubes with variable diameter sizes at the atomic level given their low resolution protomeric structures. The method is based on the symmetrical assembly of a repeating protein subunit into a nanotube. Given the protein unit-cell, and the tube diameter and helicity, we carry out all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, combined with a unique mathematical transformation. This allows us to mimic nanotubes of even huge sizes without end or edge effects. All our simulation setups attempt to explicitly adhere to the conditions under which the experiments were conducted. Thus, we are able to obtain high resolution atomic-scale structures at reasonable computational costs. We expect that our approach would prove useful in assessing protein nanotubes, as well as in silico constructions of novel nanobiomaterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.