ArticlePlant cell reports2009
Visual selection allows immediate identification of transgenic rice calli efficiently accumulating transgene products.
Article in Plant cell reports, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic transformation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- The non-homologous end-joining pathway is involved in stable transformation in rice.Frontiers in plant science · 2014Review
- PL1 fusion gene: a novel visual selectable marker gene that confers tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses in transgenic tomato.Transgenic research · 2012Article
- ER disruption and GFP degradation during non-regenerable transformation of flax with Agrobacterium tumefaciens.Protoplasma · 2012Article
- Mature seed-derived callus of the model indica rice variety Kasalath is highly competent in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.Plant cell reports · 2010Article
- The green fluorescent protein as an efficient selection marker for Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation in Hevea brasiliensis (Müll. Arg).Plant cell reports · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In genetic transformation systems, antibiotic resistance genes are routinely used as powerful markers for selecting transformed cells from surrounding non-transformed cells. However, simultaneous use of the gene encoding green fluorescent protein (GFP) and an antibiotic resistance gene facilitates the selection process, since it allows visible selection of transformed cells. Here, we report the development of a visual selection system for transformed cells using a GFP marker without selection against antibiotics after Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in rice. Both GFP protein levels and GFP fluorescence in calli isolated by visual selection were higher than in calli selected on hygromycin (Hyg), suggesting that transgenic calli hyper-accumulating GFP were efficiently obtained by selection using GFP fluorescence itself rather than Hyg resistance. Furthermore, gfp transcripts in calli isolated by visual selection were more abundant than under Hyg selection; in contrast, transcript levels of hpt in calli selected visually were comparable to those obtained under Hyg selection. These results suggest that there was no correlation between hpt and gfp expression levels, despite the fact that they are aligned in tandem on an integrated locus after selection by either GFP fluorescence or Hyg resistance. This fact indicates that positional effects can influence the expression of each transgene differently, even when they are located in tandem at the same locus. In summary, based on our results, we discuss a model system for rice cell culture transformation for the production of recombinant proteins using visual selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.