Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19198764›Full record

ReviewImmunologic research2009

Understanding the focused CD4 T cell response to antigen and pathogenic organisms.

Jason M Weaver, Andrea J Sant

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Immunologic research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Computational Evolution Protocol for Peptide Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Immune System as a Sensory System.International journal of biomedical science : IJBS · 2010
    Article
  17. Immunology at the university of Rochester.Immunologic research · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jason M WeaverDavid H. Smith Center for Vaccine Biology and Immunology, AaB Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Andrea J Sant

Funding

Immunodominance in CD4 T Cell ResponsesR01AI051542 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI SANT, ANDREA JANINE · 2002 to 2012
$3.6M
LOCAL AND SYSTEMIC CYTOKINE RESPONSES IN INFLUENZA A VIRUS INFECTIONS OF HUMANSZ01AI000785 · NIAID · NIAID EXTRAMURAL ACTIVITIES · PI STRAUS, STEPHEN E. · 1997 to 2001
–
NIAID NIH HHS R01AI51542NIAID NIH HHS T32-AI0785PHS HHS HHSN 266200700008C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunodominance is a term that reflects the final, very limited peptide specificity of T cells that are elicited during an immune response. Recent experiments in our laboratory compel us to propose a new paradigm for the control of immunodominance in CD4 T cell responses, stating that immunodominance is peptide-intrinsic and is dictated by the off-rate of peptides from MHC class II molecules. Our studies have revealed that persistence of peptide:class II complexes both predicts and controls CD4 T cell immunodominance and that this parameter can be rationally manipulated to either promote or eliminate immune responses. Mechanistically, we have determined that DM editing in APC is a key event that is influenced by the kinetic stability of class II:peptide complexes and that differential persistence of complexes also impacts the expansion phase of the immune response. These studies have important implications for rational vaccine design and for understanding the immunological mechanisms that limit the specificity of CD4 T cell responses.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityAntigen PresentationAntigen-Presenting CellsAntigensCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHumansImmunodominant EpitopesPeptidesVaccinesAntigensHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIImmunodominant EpitopesPeptidesVaccines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.