Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19197975›Full record

ArticleCancer2009

Predicting neuroendocrine tumor (carcinoid) neoplasia using gene expression profiling and supervised machine learning.

Ignat Drozdov, Mark Kidd, Boaz Nadler, Robert L Camp, Shrikant M Mane, Oyvind Hauso, Bjorn I Gustafsson, Irvin M Modlin

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The use of Ki-67 labeling index to grade pulmonary well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms: current best evidence.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Nuclear imaging of neuroendocrine tumors with unknown primary: why, when and how?European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2015
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ignat DrozdovDepartment of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8062, USA.
Mark Kidd
Boaz Nadler
Robert L Camp
Shrikant M Mane
Oyvind Hauso
Bjorn I Gustafsson
Irvin M Modlin
Yale University · USNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOWeizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

Molecular strategies to define carcinoids and rationalize surgical interventionR01CA115825 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MODLIN, IRVIN M · 2006 to 2009
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01-CA115285NCI NIH HHS R01 CA115825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA more accurate taxonomy of small intestinal (SI) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is necessary to accurately predict tumor behavior and prognosis and to define therapeutic strategy. In this study, the authors identified a panel of such markers that have been implicated in tumorigenicity, metastasis, and hormone production and hypothesized that transcript levels of the genes melanoma antigen family D2 (MAGE-D2), metastasis-associated 1 (MTA1), nucleosome assembly protein 1-like (NAP1L1), Ki-67 (a marker of proliferation), survivin, frizzled homolog 7 (FZD7), the Kiss1 metastasis suppressor (Kiss1), neuropilin 2 (NRP2), and chromogranin A (CgA) could be used to define primary SI NETs and to predict the development of metastases.

methodsSeventy-three clinically and World Health Organization pathologically classified NET samples (primary tumor, n = 44 samples; liver metastases, n = 29 samples) and 30 normal human enterochromaffin (EC) cell preparations were analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Transcript levels were normalized to 3 NET housekeeping genes (asparagine-linked glycosylation 9 or ALG9, transcription factor CP2 or TFCP2, and zinc finger protein 410 or ZNF410) using geNorm analysis. A predictive gene-based model was constructed using supervised learning algorithms from the transcript expression levels.

resultsPrimary SI NETs could be differentiated from normal human EC cell preparations with 100% specificity and 92% sensitivity. Well differentiated NETs (WDNETs), well differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and poorly differentiated NETs (PDNETs) were classified with a specificity of 78%, 78%, and 71%, respectively; whereas poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas were misclassified as either WDNETs or PDNETs. Metastases were predicted in all cases with 100% sensitivity and specificity.

conclusionsThe current results indicated that gene expression profiling and supervised machine learning can be used to classify SI NET subtypes and accurately predict metastasis. The authors believe that the application of this technique will facilitate accurate molecular pathologic delineation of NET disease, better define its extent, facilitate the assessment of prognosis, and provide a guide for the identification of appropriate strategies for individualized patient treatment.

Indexed as

Electronic Data ProcessingGene Expression ProfilingAlgorithmsCarcinoid TumorEnterochromaffin CellsFrozen SectionsHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsNeoplasm MetastasisPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityValidation Studies as Topic

Identifiers

PMID19197975
PMCPMC2743551
OpenAlexW2010478180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.