Nanomedicine: shorting neurons with nanotubes.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. From 2D to 3D: novel nanostructured scaffolds to investigate signalling in reconstructed neuronal networks.Scientific reports · 2015
   Article
2. Enhanced neural cell adhesion and neurite outgrowth on graphene-based biomimetic substrates.BioMed research international · 2014
   Article
3. Carbon nanotube scaffolds tune synaptic strength in cultured neural circuits: novel frontiers in nanomaterial-tissue interactions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011
   Article
4. Combination of polymer technology and carbon nanotube array for the development of an effective drug delivery system at cellular level.Nanoscale research letters · 2009
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Carbon nanotubes might improve neuronal performance by favouring electrical shortcuts.2009

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as